ScienceToStartup
Product
Proof
DevelopersTrends
Resources
Company

113 Cherry St #92768

Seattle, WA 98104-2205

Backed by Research Labs

Product, Proof, and developer surfaces share one public navigation contract.

Product

  • Daily Dashboard
  • Signal Canvas
  • Build Loop
  • Evidence
  • Workspace
  • Terminal
  • Talent Layer
  • GitHub Velocity

Proof

  • Foresight
  • Proof Layer
  • Proof Homepage
  • Freshness Hub
  • Example Paper Page
  • Topic Proof Layer
  • Benchmark Scorecard
  • Public Dataset

Developers

  • Overview
  • Start Here
  • REST API
  • MCP Server
  • SDKs
  • Examples
  • Keys
  • Docs

Trends

  • Live Desk
  • Archive
  • Entities
  • Narratives
  • Topics
  • Methodology

Resources

  • All Resources
  • Benchmark
  • Dataset
  • Database
  • Glossary
  • Directory
  • Templates
  • Topics

Company

  • Company Hub
  • About
  • Articles
  • Changelog
  • Careers
  • Enterprise
  • Scout
  • RFPs
  • FAQ
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Contact
ScienceToStartup

Copyright © 2026 ScienceToStartup. All rights reserved.

Privacy|Legal
  1. Home
  2. Signal Canvas
  3. Contrastive Attribution in the Wild: An Interpretability Ana
← Back to Paper

Contrastive Attribution in the Wild: An Interpretability Analysis of LLM Failures on Realistic Benchmarks

Stale15h agoPending verification refs / 3 sources / Verification pending
Export BriefOpen in Build LoopConnect with Author
View PDF ↗
Viability
0.0/10

Compared to this week’s papers

Verification pending

Use This Via API or MCP

Use Signal Canvas as the narrative proof surface

Signal Canvas is the citation-first public layer for turning one paper into a structured commercialization narrative. Use it to hand off into REST, MCP, Build Loop, and launch-pack execution without losing source lineage.

Signal Canvas APIPaper Proof PageOpen Build LoopLaunch Pack Example

Freshness

Signal Canvas proof surface

Canonical route: /signal-canvas/contrastive-attribution-in-the-wild-an-interpretability-analysis-of-llm-failures-on-realistic-benchmarks

building
Observed
2026-04-21
Fresh until
2026-05-05
Coverage
50%
Source count
3
Stale after
2026-05-05

Verification is still converging across references, source coverage, and proof checks.

Proof Quality

One canonical proof ledger now drives the badge, counts, indexing, and commercialization gating.

Verification pending
Last verified
2026-04-21
References
0
Sources
3
Coverage
50%

Commercialization rails stay hidden until proof clears: proof_status, references_count.

Search indexing stays off until proof clears: proof_status, references_count.

Agent Handoff

Contrastive Attribution in the Wild: An Interpretability Analysis of LLM Failures on Realistic Benchmarks

Canonical ID contrastive-attribution-in-the-wild-an-interpretability-analysis-of-llm-failures-on-realistic-benchmarks | Route /signal-canvas/contrastive-attribution-in-the-wild-an-interpretability-analysis-of-llm-failures-on-realistic-benchmarks

REST example

curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/signal-canvas/contrastive-attribution-in-the-wild-an-interpretability-analysis-of-llm-failures-on-realistic-benchmarks

MCP example

{
  "tool": "search_signal_canvas",
  "arguments": {
    "mode": "paper",
    "paper_ref": "contrastive-attribution-in-the-wild-an-interpretability-analysis-of-llm-failures-on-realistic-benchmarks",
    "query_text": "Summarize Contrastive Attribution in the Wild: An Interpretability Analysis of LLM Failures on Realistic Benchmarks"
  }
}

source_context

{
  "surface": "signal_canvas",
  "mode": "paper",
  "query": "Contrastive Attribution in the Wild: An Interpretability Analysis of LLM Failures on Realistic Benchmarks",
  "normalized_query": "2604.17761",
  "route": "/signal-canvas/contrastive-attribution-in-the-wild-an-interpretability-analysis-of-llm-failures-on-realistic-benchmarks",
  "paper_ref": "contrastive-attribution-in-the-wild-an-interpretability-analysis-of-llm-failures-on-realistic-benchmarks",
  "topic_slug": null,
  "benchmark_ref": null,
  "dataset_ref": null
}

Evidence Receipt

Route status: building

Claims: 0

References: Pending verification

Proof: Verification pending

Freshness state: computing

Source paper: Contrastive Attribution in the Wild: An Interpretability Analysis of LLM Failures on Realistic Benchmarks

PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.17761v1

Source count: 3

Coverage: 50%

Last proof check: 2026-04-21T02:40:05.073Z

Paper Conversation

Citation-first answers with explicit evidence receipts, disagreement handling, commercialization framing, and next actions.

Paper Mode

Contrastive Attribution in the Wild: An Interpretability Analysis of LLM Failures on Realistic Benchmarks

Overall score: 4/10
Lineage: 1995333e20da…
Cmd/Ctrl+K
Search the latest paper corpus with startup-focused AI synthesis.

Canonical Paper Receipt

Last verification: 2026-04-21T02:40:05.073Z

Freshness: fresh

Proof: unverified

Repo: missing

References: 0

Sources: 3

Coverage: 50%

Missingness
  • - repo_url
  • - references
  • - proof_status
Unknowns
  • - proof verification has not been recorded yet

Mode Notes

  • Corpus mode searches the research corpus broadly.
  • Paper mode pins trust state to the canonical paper kernel.
  • Workspace mode blends saved sources, prior evidence queries, and linked papers.

Preparing verified analysis

Dimensions overall score 4.0

GitHub Code Pulse

No public code linked for this paper yet.

Claim map

No public claim map is available for this paper yet.

Author intelligence and commercialization panels stay hidden until the proof receipt is verified, cites at least 3 references, includes at least 2 sources, and clears 50% coverage. The paper narrative and citation surfaces remain public while verification is pending.

Keep exploring

Builds On This
A Monosemantic Attribution Framework for Stable Interpretability in Clinical Neuroscience Large Language Models
Score 3.0down
Prior Work
LLM attribution analysis across different fine-tuning strategies and model scales for automated code compliance
Score 4.0stable
Prior Work
LLMbench: A Comparative Close Reading Workbench for Large Language Models
Score 4.0stable
Higher Viability
Probing for Knowledge Attribution in Large Language Models
Score 6.0up
Higher Viability
XAI for Coding Agent Failures: Transforming Raw Execution Traces into Actionable Insights
Score 8.0up
Higher Viability
In-the-Wild Model Organisms: Mitigating Undesirable Emergent Behaviors in Production LLM Post-Training via Data Attribution
Score 5.0up
Competing Approach
From Early Encoding to Late Suppression: Interpreting LLMs on Character Counting Tasks
Score 4.0stable
Competing Approach
Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models:A Survey of Design Principles and Architectures
Score 3.0down

Startup potential card

Startup potential card preview
Share on XLinkedIn

Related Resources

  • What are the practical implications of improved LLM interpretability for businesses?(question)
  • What are the implications of reduced parameter entanglement for LLM interpretability?(question)
  • What are the benefits of using numeric self-reports for LLM interpretability in conversational AI?(question)

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Recommended Stack

PyTorchML Framework
FastAPIBackend
TensorFlowML Framework
JAXML Framework
KerasML Framework

Startup Essentials

Antigravity

AI Agent IDE

Render

Deploy Backend

Railway

Full-Stack Deploy

Supabase

Backend & Auth

Vercel

Deploy Frontend

Firebase

Google Backend

Hugging Face Hub

ML Model Hub

Banana.dev

GPU Inference

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

MVP Investment

$10K - $14K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
GPU Compute
$800
LLM API Credits
$500
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

0.5-1x

3yr ROI

6-15x

GPU-heavy products have higher costs but premium pricing. Expect break-even by 12mo, then 40%+ margins at scale.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Talent Scout

Find Builders

LLM experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.