Three Models of RLHF Annotation: Extension, Evidence, and Authority explores This paper theoretically distinguishes three models of human feedback for large language models to improve annotation strategies.. Commercial viability score: 2/10 in LLM Alignment.
Use This Via API or MCP
This route is the stable paper-level surface for citations, viability, references, and downstream handoffs. Use it as the proof layer behind Signal Canvas, workspace creation, and launch-pack generation.
Page Freshness
Canonical route: /paper/three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authority
Page-specific freshness sourced from this paper's evidence receipt and score bundle.
Agent Handoff
Canonical ID three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authority | Route /paper/three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authority
REST example
curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/paper/three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authorityMCP example
{
"tool": "get_paper",
"arguments": {
"arxiv_id": "2604.25895"
}
}source_context
{
"surface": "paper",
"mode": "paper",
"query": "Three Models of RLHF Annotation: Extension, Evidence, and Authority",
"normalized_query": "2604.25895",
"route": "/paper/three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authority",
"paper_ref": "three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authority",
"topic_slug": null,
"benchmark_ref": null,
"dataset_ref": null
}Paper proof page receipt window
/buildability/three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authority
Subject: Three Models of RLHF Annotation: Extension, Evidence, and Authority
Verdict
Ignore
Verdict is Ignore because current viability and proof state do not clear the buildability gate.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Structured compute envelope
Insufficient data
No data, compute, hardware, memory, latency, dependency, or serving requirement receipt is attached.
Constellation, claims, and market context stay visible on the paper proof page even when commercialization rails are held back for incomplete proof receipts.
Research neighborhood
Interactive graph renders after load.
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 2.0
No public competitor map is available for this paper yet.
Owned Distribution
Get the weekly shortlist of commercializable papers, benchmark movers, and proof receipts that matter for product execution.
References are not available from the internal index yet.
Receipt path
/buildability/three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authority
Paper ref
three-models-of-rlhf-annotation-extension-evidence-and-authority
arXiv id
2604.25895
Generated at
2026-04-29T03:19:25.602Z
Evidence freshness
fresh
Last verification
2026-04-29T03:19:25.602Z
Sources
3
References
0
Coverage
50%
Lineage hash
6fa1637ad178be1e8b4699656c8ff06ca819131fd0b0c710f46b7cf4180242e8
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Pending verification refs / 3 sources / Verification pending
repo_url
references