Measuring What Matters -- or What's Convenient?: Robustness of LLM-Based Scoring Systems to Construct-Irrelevant Factors
Measuring What Matters -- or What's Convenient?: Robustness of LLM-Based Scoring Systems to Construct-Irrelevant Factors explores This research evaluates the robustness of LLM-based essay scoring systems to irrelevant factors, suggesting potential for more reliable automated assessment.. Commercial viability score: 4/10 in LLM Evaluation.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisLLMs Do Not Grade Essays Like HumansViability: 3.0
- Builds On ThisUnderstanding LLM Evaluator Behavior: A Structured Multi-Evaluator Framework for Merchant Risk AssessmentViability: 3.0
- Higher ViabilityLLM Essay Scoring Under Holistic and Analytic Rubrics: Prompt Effects and BiasViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityThe Paradox of Robustness: Decoupling Rule-Based Logic from Affective Noise in High-Stakes Decision-MakingViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityHow Uncertain Is the Grade? A Benchmark of Uncertainty Metrics for LLM-Based Automatic Assessment