LLMs Do Not Grade Essays Like Humans
LLMs Do Not Grade Essays Like Humans explores Evaluating LLMs for essay scoring reveals their scoring patterns differ from human graders, limiting their direct application without further refinement.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in LLM Applications.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Prior WorkCan LLMs interpret figurative language as humans do?: surface-level vs representational similarityViability: 3.0
- Prior WorkUnderstanding LLM Evaluator Behavior: A Structured Multi-Evaluator Framework for Merchant Risk AssessmentViability: 3.0
- Higher ViabilityHow LLMs Distort Our Written LanguageViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityLLM Essay Scoring Under Holistic and Analytic Rubrics: Prompt Effects and BiasViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityEvaluating Austrian A-Level German Essays with Large Language Models for Automated Essay Scoring
Related Resources
- What are the best practices for implementing causal prompt optimization in enterprise LLM applications?(question)
- How does modality-aware scheduling in RPS-Serve help with multimodal LLM applications?(question)
- How can AI infrastructure be optimized for real-time LLM applications requiring low latency?(question)