Epistemic Filtering and Collective Hallucination: A Jury Theorem for Confidence-Calibrated Agents
Epistemic Filtering and Collective Hallucination: A Jury Theorem for Confidence-Calibrated Agents explores Develop a confidence-calibration framework for heterogeneous agents to improve collective decision-making accuracy.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in AI Decision-Making.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisArchitecting Trust in Artificial Epistemic AgentsViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisThe Confidence Gate Theorem: When Should Ranked Decision Systems Abstain?Viability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisAuditing Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning Trees Outperforms Majority Vote and LLM-as-JudgeViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisWhat Capable Agents Must Know: Selection Theorems for Robust Decision-Making under UncertaintyViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisUpholding Epistemic Agency: A Brouwerian Assertibility Constraint for Responsible AI
Related Resources
- What are the ethical dilemmas of AI decision-making in unavoidable accident scenarios?(question)
- What are the legal implications of AI decision-making that exhibits bias against certain demographics?(question)
- What are the ethical dilemmas surrounding AI decision-making in emergency aviation scenarios?(question)