Breaking the Martingale Curse: Multi-Agent Debate via Asymmetric Cognitive Potential Energy
Breaking the Martingale Curse: Multi-Agent Debate via Asymmetric Cognitive Potential Energy explores AceMAD leverages cognitive potential energy in multi-agent debate to overcome the Martingale Curse, enabling more accurate reasoning and consensus-building in LLMs.. Commercial viability score: 8/10 in Multi-Agent Systems.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisRUMAD: Reinforcement-Unifying Multi-Agent DebateViability: 6.0
- Builds On ThisMIND: Multi-agent inference for negotiation dialogue in travel planningViability: 7.0
- Builds On ThisCourtroom-Style Multi-Agent Debate with Progressive RAG and Role-Switching for Controversial Claim VerificationViability: 7.0
- Builds On ThisContext Learning for Multi-Agent DiscussionViability: 3.0
- Builds On ThisAdaptive Robust Estimator for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningViability: 7.0