proof blockPage 268%
This equation captures one of the core mathematical components of the system. |A| = m may differ from |P| = n. A single premise may yield multiple axioms (e.g., when splitting
Do LLMs Game Formalization? Evaluating Faithfulness in Logical Reasoning explores Evaluating LLMs for formalization gaming in logical reasoning, revealing distinct unfaithfulness modes in proof generation.. Commercial viability score: 7/10 in LLM Reasoning.
Use This Via API or MCP
This route is the stable paper-level surface for citations, viability, references, and downstream handoffs. Use it as the proof layer behind Signal Canvas, workspace creation, and launch-pack generation.
Page Freshness
Canonical route: /paper/do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoning
This page is showing the last landed evidence receipt and score bundle because the latest proof data is outside the freshness window.
Agent Handoff
Canonical ID do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoning | Route /paper/do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoning
REST example
curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/paper/do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoningMCP example
{
"tool": "get_paper",
"arguments": {
"arxiv_id": "2604.19459"
}
}source_context
{
"surface": "paper",
"mode": "paper",
"query": "Do LLMs Game Formalization? Evaluating Faithfulness in Logical Reasoning",
"normalized_query": "2604.19459",
"route": "/paper/do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoning",
"paper_ref": "do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoning",
"topic_slug": null,
"benchmark_ref": null,
"dataset_ref": null
}Paper proof page receipt window
/buildability/do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoning
Subject: Do LLMs Game Formalization? Evaluating Faithfulness in Logical Reasoning
Verdict
Build Now
Verdict is Build Now because viability and implementation proof cleared the Wave 1 scaffold thresholds.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Structured compute envelope
Insufficient data
No data, compute, hardware, memory, latency, dependency, or serving requirement receipt is attached.
Constellation, claims, and market context stay visible on the paper proof page even when commercialization rails are held back for incomplete proof receipts.
Research neighborhood
Interactive graph renders after load.
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 7.0
Visual citation anchors from the paper document graph.
This equation captures one of the core mathematical components of the system. |A| = m may differ from |P| = n. A single premise may yield multiple axioms (e.g., when splitting
Owned Distribution
Get the weekly shortlist of commercializable papers, benchmark movers, and proof receipts that matter for product execution.
References are not available from the internal index yet.
Receipt path
/buildability/do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoning
Paper ref
do-llms-game-formalization-evaluating-faithfulness-in-logical-reasoning
arXiv id
2604.19459
Generated at
2026-04-22T20:32:43.667Z
Evidence freshness
stale
Last verification
2026-04-22T20:32:43.667Z
Sources
4
References
0
Coverage
83%
Lineage hash
d8f59d74c27aea6ad903999e77cfb041c6e53a2e8c14d265de16e970830f774e
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Pending verification refs / 4 sources / Verification pending
references
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
This equation defines the score or evaluation function that determines model quality.
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
This equation captures one of the core mathematical components of the system. GPT- Base 94.6±1.1 86.6±1.2 42.9±2.3 93.9±0.3 97.3±0.9 70.5±2.1 27.0±1.8 96.7±1.8 Dir
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
No public competitor map is available for this paper yet.