Co-evolving Agent Architectures and Interpretable Reasoning for Automated Optimization explores A co-evolutionary framework that automates complex operations research tasks by evolving agent architectures and interpretable reasoning for adaptive optimization.. Commercial viability score: 7/10 in Agents.
Use This Via API or MCP
This route is the stable paper-level surface for citations, viability, references, and downstream handoffs. Use it as the proof layer behind Signal Canvas, workspace creation, and launch-pack generation.
Page Freshness
Canonical route: /paper/co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimization
This page is showing the last landed evidence receipt and score bundle because the latest proof data is outside the freshness window.
Agent Handoff
Canonical ID co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimization | Route /paper/co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimization
REST example
curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/paper/co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimizationMCP example
{
"tool": "get_paper",
"arguments": {
"arxiv_id": "2604.17708"
}
}source_context
{
"surface": "paper",
"mode": "paper",
"query": "Co-evolving Agent Architectures and Interpretable Reasoning for Automated Optimization",
"normalized_query": "2604.17708",
"route": "/paper/co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimization",
"paper_ref": "co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimization",
"topic_slug": null,
"benchmark_ref": null,
"dataset_ref": null
}Paper proof page receipt window
/buildability/co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimization
Subject: Co-evolving Agent Architectures and Interpretable Reasoning for Automated Optimization
Verdict
Watch
Verdict is Watch because viability or proof quality is intermediate and should be re-evaluated before execution.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Structured compute envelope
Insufficient data
No data, compute, hardware, memory, latency, dependency, or serving requirement receipt is attached.
Constellation, claims, and market context stay visible on the paper proof page even when commercialization rails are held back for incomplete proof receipts.
Research neighborhood
Interactive graph renders after load.
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 7.0
Visual citation anchors from the paper document graph.
Owned Distribution
Get the weekly shortlist of commercializable papers, benchmark movers, and proof receipts that matter for product execution.
References are not available from the internal index yet.
Receipt path
/buildability/co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimization
Paper ref
co-evolving-agent-architectures-and-interpretable-reasoning-for-automated-optimization
arXiv id
2604.17708
Generated at
2026-04-21T02:40:14.906Z
Evidence freshness
stale
Last verification
2026-04-21T02:40:14.906Z
Sources
3
References
0
Coverage
50%
Lineage hash
6c80baa0b62079ed7785d1236c138ea96d248d0933c196a3c69fce0745828da7
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Pending verification refs / 3 sources / Verification pending
repo_url
references
This equation captures one of the core mathematical components of the system. subset s ∈S is assigned a subset-level fitness weight ωs.
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
This equation captures one of the core mathematical components of the system. ±1.25% 42.18±1.12% 77.91±0.64% 64.90±0.96% 45.12±1.54%
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
This equation captures one of the core mathematical components of the system. ±1.18% 43.60±1.05% 78.45±0.58% 68.16±0.88% 52.44±1.42%
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
No public competitor map is available for this paper yet.