Opportunity summary
Score0.0Public score shown from the verified overall while the stale axis breakdown refreshesThis canonical paper page includes Commercialization Proof and Related Resources.
ARXIV:2606.09245 · UNCATEGORIZED · SUBMITTED 09 JUN · 03:25 UTC · FRESHNESS FRESH
ARXIV:2606.09245UNCATEGORIZEDSUBMITTED 09 JUN · 03:25 UTCFRESHNESS FRESHYuan Zeng · Bin Song · Jie Guo · Yuwen Chen · arXiv
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 0.0/10 on the public viability pass. Through extensive experiments, we prove that we establish a new state-of-the-art method for the few-shot object detection task. Code availability…
Opportunity summary
Pain customer pain not on file
Evidence 0 refs | 3 sources | 50% coverage
Blocker Evidence unverified
Few-shot object detection has gained widely attention in recent years.
Few-shot object detection has gained widely attention in recent years. Some excellent algorithms have been proposed to handle this task.
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 0.0/10 on the public viability pass. Through extensive experiments, we prove that we establish a new state-of-the-art method for the few-shot object detection task. Code availability is flagged in the…
Uncategorized moved forward this cycle; last verified June 2026. Public score 0.0/10. Production flags indicate code availability.
Continue into Read for claims, analysis, references, and neighboring papers.
Opportunity summary
Score0.0Public score shown from the verified overall while the stale axis breakdown refreshesAnalysis summary
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 0.0/10 on the public viability pass. Through extensive experiments, we prove that we establish a new state-of-the-art method for the few-shot object detection task. Code availability…
Loading BUILD…
WATCHTOWER
No verified watchtower monitor rows yet.
FORESIGHT
No prediction yet — minted on next Foresight batch.
OPPORTUNITYKERNEL CHANGES SINCE LAST VIEW
No verified OpportunityKernel changes since the last view.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE UPDATES
No verified competitive landscape changes yet.
RELATED PAPER UPDATES
No verified related paper changes yet.
SIGNAL CANVAS HISTORY AND DELTAS
No Signal Canvas history deltas yet.
TIMELINE
Save this paper to start tracking momentum - commits, demos, and score changes appear here.
No tracked events yet.
Score trend will appear after multiple data points.
BUZZ
Buzz trend pending.
Paper Pack
10.48550/arXiv.2606.09245Abstract
Few-shot object detection has gained widely attention in recent years. Some excellent algorithms have been proposed to handle this task. However, most of these algorithms rely on the performance of few-shot classification. Unlike previous attempts, our work focuses on the problem of unbalanced distribution of region proposals between the novel classes and the base classes. In order to alleviate this unbalanced distribution, we propose the proposal refinement approach for different training phases. Specifically, refinement loss is designed for the base training phase to enhance sensitivity of the model to novel classes, and refinement branch is introduced as an auxiliary branch for RPN (Region Proposal Networks) to generate more novel proposals in the fine-tuning phase. By rebalancing the proposal distribution, the proposed approach outperforms the baselines methods by roughly 1\%$\sim$6\% on current benchmarks without increasing any inference time. Through extensive experiments, we prove that we establish a new state-of-the-art method for the few-shot object detection task.
Source availability
PDF linkedThe paper record includes a public PDF URL.
Extraction status
Parse run linkedA document parse run is attached to this paper.
Proof status
unverified0 refs; 3 sources; 50% coverage.
What was readable
Derived fallback: Estimated from adjacent evidence; not verified from source.
Viability
Time to MVP
Commercial
Export
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 0.0
RESULT
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 0.0/10 on the public viability pass. Through extensive experiments, we prove that we establish a new state-of-the-art method for the few-shot object detection task. Code availability is flagged in the production record; the public repository...
PROBLEM
Few-shot object detection has gained widely attention in recent years.
METHOD
Few-shot object detection has gained widely attention in recent years. Some excellent algorithms have been proposed to handle this task.
WHY NOW
Uncategorized moved forward this cycle; last verified June 2026. Public score 0.0/10. Production flags indicate code availability.
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 10, "author": "Yuan Zeng; Bin Song; Jie Guo; Yuwen Chen", "title": "Proposal Refinement for Few-Shot Object Detection", "creation date": null, "modification date": null
Implication not extracted yet.
partial
Preview the source document here, or use the hero PDF action for a new tab.
Reference metadata is not materialized in the public index yet. The source PDF remains the authority; cache refresh is optional.
CITED BY
No citing papers are indexed in the public S2S graph yet. This is an explicit zero-signal state, not a hidden lookup.
Foundation
Extension
Owned Distribution
Get the weekly shortlist of commercializable papers, benchmark movers, and proof receipts that matter for product execution.
Paper-native neighborhood for concepts, methods, materials, markets, and competitors. Missing lanes stay labeled instead of disappearing behind commercialization gates.
Concepts
Methods
Materials
Markets
Competitors
No named competitor graph is public yet; the page still exposes the segment, adoption evidence, and score state so the commercial read is not blank.
Segment
Uncategorized
Adoption evidence
No public code link in the paper record yet
Commercial read
0.0/10 public viability
Direct
Adjacent
Substitute
Unknown
No indexed public discussion is attached to 2606.09245 yet. That is a visibility signal, not a blank module: the monitor is watching the public channels below.
Hacker News
Not indexed yet
Not indexed yet
Bluesky
Not indexed yet
Conflicting
/api/v1/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection/paper-pack/api/v1/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection/build-passport/api/openapi.json/api/mcpsciencetostartup://surfaces/paper-workspacepaper_packbuild_passportopportunity_kernelforesightsource_proofevidence_state{
"contract_version": "paper-r2",
"paper_id": "9e168ab0-9c45-45dc-8a7b-92f55031bf4b",
"arxiv_id": "2606.09245",
"canonical_route": "/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection",
"active_tab": "synced from current hash by the drawer client",
"selected_artifact": "proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection",
"endpoints": {
"paper_pack": "/api/v1/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection/paper-pack",
"build_passport": "/api/v1/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection/build-passport",
"mcp_resource": "sciencetostartup://surfaces/paper-workspace"
}
}Canonical route, proof status, last verified, refs, sources, and coverage.
Page Freshness
Canonical route: /paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection
Page-specific freshness sourced from this paper's evidence receipt and score bundle.
Endpoint list, payload shape, route context, and copyable handoff data.
Agent Handoff
Canonical ID proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection | Route /paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection
REST example
curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detectionMCP example
{
"tool": "get_paper",
"arguments": {
"arxiv_id": "2606.09245"
}
}source_context
{
"surface": "paper",
"mode": "paper",
"query": "Proposal Refinement for Few-Shot Object Detection",
"normalized_query": "2606.09245",
"route": "/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection",
"paper_ref": "proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection",
"topic_slug": null,
"benchmark_ref": null,
"dataset_ref": null
}Verdict, compute envelope, blockers, signature state, and receipt links.
Paper proof page receipt window
/buildability/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection
Subject: Proposal Refinement for Few-Shot Object Detection
Verdict
Ignore
Verdict is Ignore because current viability and proof state do not clear the buildability gate.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Structured compute envelope
Insufficient data
No data, compute, hardware, memory, latency, dependency, or serving requirement receipt is attached.
Visual citations from the paper document graph.
Visual citation anchors from the paper document graph.
This equation defines the loss the model is optimizing during training.
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
This equation captures one of the core mathematical components of the system. j=1 yj = 1. For a proposal r, reweighting factor wk is
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
This equation defines the loss the model is optimizing during training.
Page and bbox are available; crop image is pending.
The application/ld+json payload rendered for agents.
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "WebPage",
"@id": "https://sciencetostartup.com/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection#webpage",
"url": "https://sciencetostartup.com/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection",
"name": "Proposal Refinement for Few-Shot Object Detection",
"description": "Few-shot object detection has gained widely attention in recent years. Some excellent algorithms have been proposed to handle this task. However, most of these algorithms rely on the performance of few-shot classification. Unlike previous attempts, our work focuses on the problem of unbalanced distribution of region proposals between the novel classes and the base classes. In order to alleviate this unbalanced distribution, we propose the proposal refinement approach for different training phases. Specifically, refinement loss is designed for the base training phase to enhance sensitivity of the model to novel classes, and refinement branch is introduced as an auxiliary branch for RPN (Region Proposal Networks) to generate more novel proposals in the fine-tuning phase. By rebalancing the proposal distribution, the proposed approach outperforms the baselines methods by roughly 1\\%$\\sim$6\\% on current benchmarks without increasing any inference time. Through extensive experiments, we prove that we establish a new state-of-the-art method for the few-shot object detection task.",
"isPartOf": {
"@id": "https://sciencetostartup.com/#website"
}
},
{
"@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"@id": "https://sciencetostartup.com/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection#scholarlyArticle",
"headline": "Proposal Refinement for Few-Shot Object Detection",
"description": "Few-shot object detection has gained widely attention in recent years. Some excellent algorithms have been proposed to handle this task. However, most of these algorithms rely on the performance of few-shot classification. Unlike previous attempts, our work focuses on the problem of unbalanced distribution of region proposals between the novel classes and the base classes. In order to alleviate this unbalanced distribution, we propose the proposal refinement approach for different training phas…",
"url": "https://sciencetostartup.com/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection",
"sameAs": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09245",
"identifier": {
"@type": "PropertyValue",
"propertyID": "arXiv",
"value": "2606.09245"
},
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": {
"@id": "https://sciencetostartup.com/#website"
},
"datePublished": "2026-06-08T09:20:32.000Z",
"author": [
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Yuan Zeng"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Bin Song"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Jie Guo"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Yuwen Chen"
}
],
"additionalProperty": [
{
"@type": "PropertyValue",
"propertyID": "researchDomain",
"value": "Uncategorized"
},
{
"@type": "PropertyValue",
"propertyID": "commercialReadiness",
"value": "code"
}
]
},
{
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Home",
"item": "https://sciencetostartup.com"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "Uncategorized",
"item": "https://sciencetostartup.com/topics"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 3,
"name": "Proposal Refinement for Few-Shot Object Detection",
"item": "https://sciencetostartup.com/paper/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection"
}
]
}
]
}Receipt path
/buildability/proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection
Paper ref
proposal-refinement-for-few-shot-object-detection
arXiv id
2606.09245
Generated at
2026-06-09T03:25:45.059Z
Evidence freshness
fresh
Last verification
2026-06-09T03:25:45.059Z
Sources
3
References
0
Coverage
50%
Lineage hash
bece7e8895ac00d5470c66a6b816af366c393a60103ded9dfa934a04ca68fd3f
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Pending verification refs / 3 sources / Verification pending
repo_url
references
2/3 checks · 67%
Build Passport
Build passport pending - Proof Lab budget No verified cost estimate / $7.00 cap
status
missing
reason
passport_row_missing
proof status
unverified
cost/budget
No verified cost estimate
confidence low
next verification path
Build brief missing until Build Passport data exists.
Source missing: Build Passport payload.
Experiment plan missing until prototype path is available.
No prototype path attached.
Validation checklist missing until required assets, cost, and regulatory flags are verified.
No checklist artifact is attached to the Build Passport payload.
Derived signals show verified:false until source-backed receipts exist.
Evidence coverage
OpportunityKernel evidence_receipt
0 refs / 3 sources / 50% coverage
fresh
Verify missing sources before using this as buyer proof. verified:false
Build readiness
BuildPassport EvidenceState
passport absent
fresh
Run Proof Lab or inspect typed missing state. verified:false
Artifact maturity
GitHub and Hugging Face maturity payloads
No public artifact surface observed
fresh
Open source artifacts or mark the gap as missing. verified:false
Technical feasibility
partial
Current read
Runnable path is not fully verified.
Evidence
No Build Passport payload attached.
Gaps
Next test
Run minimal reproduction from the Build Passport prototype path.
Market urgency
missing
Current read
Buyer urgency is not verified from source.
No named scientific founder assigned.
Paper authors are not treated as operators without consent.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Prototype owner missing.
Build Passport does not name an implementer.
People
No named person assigned.
ARTIFACTS
No public artifacts yet.
DEFENSIBILITY
Defensibility and confidence evidence pending.
Evidence
0 references, 3 sources, 50% evidence coverage.
Gaps
Next test
Collect buyer interview, deployment evidence, or cited demand signal.
Buyer clarity
missing
Current read
No budget owner is verified for this paper.
Evidence
Build tab has no CRM, procurement, or operator source.
Gaps
Next test
Map target operator, economic buyer, and procurement trigger.
Defensibility
missing
Current read
Defensibility signals are missing.
Evidence
No defensibility receipt attached.
Gaps
Next test
Refresh defensibility bars with source receipts.
Integration burden
missing
Current read
No public implementation surface observed.
Evidence
No GitHub or Hugging Face payload attached.
Gaps
Next test
Write integration checklist from prototype path and target workflow.
Capital intensity
missing
Current read
No observed cost estimate is verified.
Evidence
Cost passport has no observed_usd value.
Gaps
Next test
Run cost passport or mark the cost field not applicable.
Regulatory load
missing
Current read
No regulatory classification is attached.
Evidence
Build Passport ledger does not include regulatory flags.
Gaps
Next test
Classify regulatory flags before commercialization planning.
Gaps
Next verification path
Operator workflow not sourced.
No buyer or workflow interview attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
No GTM owner verified.
No CRM or outreach source attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Regulatory need unclassified.
No clinical or regulatory source attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path