ScienceToStartup
Product
Proof
DevelopersTrends
Resources
Company

113 Cherry St #92768

Seattle, WA 98104-2205

Backed by Research Labs

Product, Proof, and developer surfaces share one public navigation contract.

Product

  • Daily Dashboard
  • Signal Canvas
  • Build Loop
  • Evidence
  • Workspace
  • Terminal
  • Talent Layer
  • GitHub Velocity

Proof

  • Foresight
  • Proof Layer
  • Proof Homepage
  • Freshness Hub
  • Example Paper Page
  • Topic Proof Layer
  • Benchmark Scorecard
  • Public Dataset

Developers

  • Overview
  • Start Here
  • REST API
  • MCP Server
  • SDKs
  • Examples
  • Keys
  • Docs

Trends

  • Live Desk
  • Archive
  • Entities
  • Narratives
  • Topics
  • Methodology

Resources

  • All Resources
  • Benchmark
  • Dataset
  • Database
  • Glossary
  • Directory
  • Templates
  • Topics

Company

  • Company Hub
  • About
  • Articles
  • Changelog
  • Careers
  • Enterprise
  • Scout
  • RFPs
  • FAQ
  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Contact
ScienceToStartup

Copyright © 2026 ScienceToStartup. All rights reserved.

Privacy|Legal
  1. Home
  2. Signal Canvas
  3. Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation
← Back to Paper

Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems

Stale15d agoVerification pending / evidence receipt incomplete
Export BriefOpen in Build LoopConnect with Author
View PDF ↗
Viability
0.0/10

Compared to this week’s papers

Verification pending

Use This Via API or MCP

Use Signal Canvas as the narrative proof surface

Signal Canvas is the citation-first public layer for turning one paper into a structured commercialization narrative. Use it to hand off into REST, MCP, Build Loop, and launch-pack execution without losing source lineage.

Signal Canvas APIPaper Proof PageOpen Build LoopLaunch Pack Example

Freshness

Signal Canvas proof surface

Canonical route: /signal-canvas/too-polite-to-disagree-understanding-sycophancy-propagation-in-multi-agent-systems

building
Observed
2026-04-06
Fresh until
2026-04-20
Coverage
0%
Source count
0
Stale after
2026-04-20

Proof data is outside the preferred freshness window.

Proof Quality

One canonical proof ledger now drives the badge, counts, indexing, and commercialization gating.

Verification pending
Last verified
2026-04-06
References
0
Sources
0
Coverage
0%

Commercialization rails stay hidden until proof clears: proof_status, references_count, source_count, coverage.

Search indexing stays off until proof clears: proof_status, references_count, source_count, coverage.

Agent Handoff

Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems

Canonical ID too-polite-to-disagree-understanding-sycophancy-propagation-in-multi-agent-systems | Route /signal-canvas/too-polite-to-disagree-understanding-sycophancy-propagation-in-multi-agent-systems

REST example

curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/signal-canvas/too-polite-to-disagree-understanding-sycophancy-propagation-in-multi-agent-systems

MCP example

{
  "tool": "search_signal_canvas",
  "arguments": {
    "mode": "paper",
    "paper_ref": "too-polite-to-disagree-understanding-sycophancy-propagation-in-multi-agent-systems",
    "query_text": "Summarize Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems"
  }
}

source_context

{
  "surface": "signal_canvas",
  "mode": "paper",
  "query": "Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems",
  "normalized_query": "2604.02668",
  "route": "/signal-canvas/too-polite-to-disagree-understanding-sycophancy-propagation-in-multi-agent-systems",
  "paper_ref": "too-polite-to-disagree-understanding-sycophancy-propagation-in-multi-agent-systems",
  "topic_slug": null,
  "benchmark_ref": null,
  "dataset_ref": null
}

Evidence Receipt

Route status: building

Claims: 0

References: Pending verification

Proof: Verification pending

Freshness state: computing

Source paper: Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems

PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.02668v1

Source count: Pending verification

Coverage: 0%

Last proof check: 2026-04-06T20:16:59.808Z

Paper Conversation

Citation-first answers with explicit evidence receipts, disagreement handling, commercialization framing, and next actions.

Paper Mode

Too Polite to Disagree: Understanding Sycophancy Propagation in Multi-Agent Systems

Overall score: 4/10
Lineage: 3ab0e003fe64…
Cmd/Ctrl+K
Search the latest paper corpus with startup-focused AI synthesis.

Canonical Paper Receipt

Last verification: 2026-04-06T20:16:59.808Z

Freshness: fresh

Proof: unverified

Repo: missing

References: 0

Sources: 0

Coverage: 0%

Missingness
  • - paper_evidence_receipts.references_count
  • - paper_evidence_receipts.coverage
Unknowns
  • - Canonical evidence receipt has not been materialized yet.

Mode Notes

  • Corpus mode searches the research corpus broadly.
  • Paper mode pins trust state to the canonical paper kernel.
  • Workspace mode blends saved sources, prior evidence queries, and linked papers.

Preparing verified analysis

Dimensions overall score 4.0

GitHub Code Pulse

No public code linked for this paper yet.

Claim map

No public claim map is available for this paper yet.

Author intelligence and commercialization panels stay hidden until the proof receipt is verified, cites at least 3 references, includes at least 2 sources, and clears 50% coverage. The paper narrative and citation surfaces remain public while verification is pending.

Keep exploring

Builds On This
Ask don't tell: Reducing sycophancy in large language models
Score 3.0down
Builds On This
Good Arguments Against the People Pleasers: How Reasoning Mitigates (Yet Masks) LLM Sycophancy
Score 2.0down
Prior Work
Moral Sycophancy in Vision Language Models
Score 4.0stable
Higher Viability
SWAY: A Counterfactual Computational Linguistic Approach to Measuring and Mitigating Sycophancy
Score 7.0up
Higher Viability
The Silicon Mirror: Dynamic Behavioral Gating for Anti-Sycophancy in LLM Agents
Score 8.0up
Higher Viability
Verbalizing LLMs' assumptions to explain and control sycophancy
Score 5.0up
Higher Viability
Intersectional Sycophancy: How Perceived User Demographics Shape False Validation in Large Language Models
Score 5.0up
Higher Viability
Social Dynamics as Critical Vulnerabilities that Undermine Objective Decision-Making in LLM Collectives
Score 5.0up

Startup potential card

Startup potential card preview
Share on XLinkedIn

Related Resources

Related resources will appear here when this paper maps cleanly to topic, benchmark, or dataset surfaces.

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Recommended Stack

PyTorchML Framework
OpenAI APILLM API
Anthropic ClaudeLLM API
LangChainAgent Framework
CrewAIAgent Framework

Startup Essentials

Antigravity

AI Agent IDE

Render

Deploy Backend

Railway

Full-Stack Deploy

Supabase

Backend & Auth

Vercel

Deploy Frontend

Firebase

Google Backend

Hugging Face Hub

ML Model Hub

Banana.dev

GPU Inference

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

MVP Investment

$10K - $14K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
GPU Compute
$800
LLM API Credits
$500
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

1-2x

3yr ROI

10-25x

Automation tools have long sales cycles but high retention. Expect $5K MRR by 6mo, accelerating to $500K+ ARR at 3yr as enterprises adopt.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Talent Scout

Find Builders

Multi-Agent experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.