ScienceToStartup
DevelopersTrends

113 Cherry St #92768

Seattle, WA 98104-2205

Backed by Research Labs
All systems operational

Proof

  • Proof Layer
  • Dashboard
  • Example paper page
  • Signal Canvas
  • Topic proof layer
  • Benchmark scoreboard
  • Public dataset
  • Evidence
  • Workspace
  • Terminal
  • Talent Layer
  • Build Loop

Developers

  • Overview
  • Start Here
  • REST API
  • MCP Server
  • Examples
  • OpenAI Guide
  • API Docs

Trends

  • Live Trends Desk
  • Operator Cycle
  • Founder Brief
  • Benchmark Movers

Resources

  • Resources Hub
  • All Resources
  • Benchmark
  • Database
  • Dataset
  • Calculator
  • Glossary
  • State Reports
  • Industry Index
  • Directory
  • Templates
  • Alternatives
  • Topics

Company

  • Articles
  • Changelog
  • About
  • Careers
  • Enterprise
  • Scout
  • RFPs
  • For Media
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal
  • Contact
ScienceToStartup

Copyright © 2026 ScienceToStartup. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy|Legal
  1. Home
  2. Signal Canvas
  3. More Capable, Less Cooperative? When LLMs Fail At Zero-Cost
← Back to Paper

More Capable, Less Cooperative? When LLMs Fail At Zero-Cost Collaboration

Fresh3d ago
Clone RepoExport BriefOpen in Build LoopConnect with Author
View PDF ↗
Viability
0.0/10

Compared to this week’s papers

Evidence fresh

Use This Via API or MCP

Use Signal Canvas as the narrative proof surface

Signal Canvas is the citation-first public layer for turning one paper into a structured commercialization narrative. Use it to hand off into REST, MCP, Build Loop, and launch-pack execution without losing source lineage.

Signal Canvas APIPaper Proof PageOpen Build LoopLaunch Pack Example

Evidence Receipt

Freshness: 2026-04-10T17:22:54.133971+00:00

Claims: 0

References: 0

Proof: unverified

Freshness: fresh

Source paper: More Capable, Less Cooperative? When LLMs Fail At Zero-Cost Collaboration

PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.07821v1

Repository: https://github.com/goodfeli/dlbook_notation

Source count: 4

Coverage: 67%

Last proof check: 2026-04-10T20:18:31.620Z

Paper Conversation

Citation-first answers with explicit evidence receipts, disagreement handling, commercialization framing, and next actions.

Paper Mode

More Capable, Less Cooperative? When LLMs Fail At Zero-Cost Collaboration

Overall score: 3/10
Lineage: f7609969afdf…
Cmd/Ctrl+K
Search the latest paper corpus with startup-focused AI synthesis.

Canonical Paper Receipt

Last verification: 2026-04-10T20:18:31.620Z

Freshness: fresh

Proof: unverified

Repo: active

References: 0

Sources: 4

Coverage: 67%

Missingness
  • - references
  • - paper_extraction_scorecards
Unknowns

No unresolved unknowns recorded.

Mode Notes

  • Corpus mode searches the research corpus broadly.
  • Paper mode pins trust state to the canonical paper kernel.
  • Workspace mode blends saved sources, prior evidence queries, and linked papers.

Starting…

Dimensions overall score 3.0

GitHub Code Pulse

Stars
1,865
Health
C
Last commit
3/1/2018
Forks
379
Open repository

Claim map

Claim extraction is still pending for this paper. Check back after the next analysis run.

Competitive landscape

Competitor map is still being generated for this paper. Enable generation or check back soon.

Keep exploring

Builds On This
More at Stake: How Payoff and Language Shape LLM Agent Strategies in Cooperation Dilemmas
Score 2.0down
Prior Work
Cooperation Breakdown in LLM Agents Under Communication Delays
Score 3.0stable
Prior Work
High Volatility and Action Bias Distinguish LLMs from Humans in Group Coordination
Score 3.0stable
Higher Viability
AgentCollab: A Self-Evaluation-Driven Collaboration Paradigm for Efficient LLM Agents
Score 7.0up
Higher Viability
LLM Constitutional Multi-Agent Governance
Score 4.0up
Higher Viability
Do Agent Societies Develop Intellectual Elites? The Hidden Power Laws of Collective Cognition in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
Score 4.0up
Higher Viability
Towards a Science of Collective AI: LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Need a Transition from Blind Trial-and-Error to Rigorous Science
Score 4.0up
Higher Viability
Adaptive Collaboration with Humans: Metacognitive Policy Optimization for Multi-Agent LLMs with Continual Learning
Score 7.0up

Startup potential card

Startup potential card preview
Share on XLinkedIn

Related Resources

  • multi-agent systems(glossary)
  • What advantages do multi-agent systems provide in AI?(question)
  • What role does AI play in multi-agent systems?(question)
  • What role does AI play in multi-agent systems?(question)

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Recommended Stack

PyTorchML Framework
OpenAI APILLM API
Anthropic ClaudeLLM API
LangChainAgent Framework
CrewAIAgent Framework

Startup Essentials

Antigravity

AI Agent IDE

Render

Deploy Backend

Railway

Full-Stack Deploy

Supabase

Backend & Auth

Vercel

Deploy Frontend

Firebase

Google Backend

Hugging Face Hub

ML Model Hub

Banana.dev

GPU Inference

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

MVP Investment

$10K - $14K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
GPU Compute
$800
LLM API Credits
$500
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

1-2x

3yr ROI

10-25x

Automation tools have long sales cycles but high retention. Expect $5K MRR by 6mo, accelerating to $500K+ ARR at 3yr as enterprises adopt.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Talent Scout

View Repository

Find Builders

Multi-Agent experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.