ScienceToStartup
TrendsTopicsSavedArticlesChangelogCareersAbout

113 Cherry St #92768

Seattle, WA 98104-2205

Backed by Research Labs
All systems operational

Product

  • Dashboard
  • Workspace
  • Build Loop
  • Research Map
  • Trends
  • Topics
  • Articles

Enterprise

  • TTO Dashboard
  • Scout Reports
  • RFP Marketplace
  • API

Resources

  • All Resources
  • Benchmark
  • Database
  • Dataset
  • Calculator
  • Glossary
  • State Reports
  • Industry Index
  • Directory
  • Templates
  • Alternatives
  • Changelog
  • FAQ
  • Docs

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • For Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal
  • Contact

Community

  • Open Source
  • Community
ScienceToStartup

Copyright © 2026 ScienceToStartup. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy|Legal
  1. Home
  2. Signal Canvas
  3. CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints
← Back to Paper

CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints

Fresh1d ago
Clone RepoExport BriefOpen in Build LoopConnect with Author
View PDF ↗
Viability
0.0/10

Compared to this week’s papers

Evidence Receipt

Freshness: 2026-04-02T02:30:40.136932+00:00

Claims: 0

References: 0

Proof: partial

Distribution: unknown

Source paper: CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints

PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.15309v1

Repository: https://github.com/Junjie-Ye/CCTU

First buyer signal: unknown

Distribution channel: unknown

Last proof check: 2026-03-18T22:54:38.746549+00:00

Starting…

Dimensions overall score 7.0

GitHub Code Pulse

Stars
5
Health
C
Last commit
3/17/2026
Forks
1
Open repository

Claim map

Claim extraction is still pending for this paper. Check back after the next analysis run.

Competitive landscape

Competitor map is still being generated for this paper. Enable generation or check back soon.

Keep exploring

Builds On This
ConstraintBench: Benchmarking LLM Constraint Reasoning on Direct Optimization
Score 6.0down
Builds On This
VTC-Bench: Evaluating Agentic Multimodal Models via Compositional Visual Tool Chaining
Score 6.0down
Builds On This
Evaluating Ill-Defined Tasks in Large Language Models
Score 3.0down
Builds On This
Capture the Flags: Family-Based Evaluation of Agentic LLMs via Semantics-Preserving Transformations
Score 4.0down
Prior Work
CCR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Complex Constraints, Control Flows, and Real-World Cases
Score 7.0stable
Prior Work
MonitorBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Chain-of-Thought Monitorability in Large Language Models
Score 7.0stable
Prior Work
Large Language Model for Discrete Optimization Problems: Evaluation and Step-by-step Reasoning
Score 7.0stable
Higher Viability
Try, Check and Retry: A Divide-and-Conquer Framework for Boosting Long-context Tool-Calling Performance of LLMs
Score 8.0up

Startup potential card

Startup potential card preview
Share on XLinkedIn

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Recommended Stack

PyTorchML Framework
FastAPIBackend
TensorFlowML Framework
JAXML Framework
KerasML Framework

Startup Essentials

Antigravity

AI Agent IDE

Render

Deploy Backend

Railway

Full-Stack Deploy

Supabase

Backend & Auth

Vercel

Deploy Frontend

Firebase

Google Backend

Hugging Face Hub

ML Model Hub

Banana.dev

GPU Inference

MVP Investment

$10K - $14K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
GPU Compute
$800
LLM API Credits
$500
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

0.5-1x

3yr ROI

6-15x

GPU-heavy products have higher costs but premium pricing. Expect break-even by 12mo, then 40%+ margins at scale.

Talent Scout

View Repository

Find Builders

Benchmarking experts on LinkedIn & GitHub