Why Safety Probes Catch Liars But Miss Fanatics
Why Safety Probes Catch Liars But Miss Fanatics explores This research identifies a fundamental limitation in current AI safety probes, showing they can be evaded by models that genuinely believe in harmful actions, posing a significant challenge for detecting coherent misalignment.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in AI Safety.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisIntentional Deception as Controllable Capability in LLM AgentsViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisThe Obfuscation Atlas: Mapping Where Honesty Emerges in RLVR with Deception ProbesViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisLiterary Narrative as Moral Probe : A Cross-System Framework for Evaluating AI Ethical Reasoning and Refusal BehaviorViability: 2.0
- Prior WorkHidden Topics: Measuring Sensitive AI Beliefs with List ExperimentsViability: 3.0
- Higher ViabilityLying to Win: Assessing LLM Deception through Human-AI Games and Parallel-World Probing
Related Resources
- What are the latest research breakthroughs in automotive AI safety?(question)
- What are the commercial implications of improved LLM interpretability for AI safety and reliability?(question)
- What are the implications of Certified Circuits for AI safety and robustness?(question)
- AI Safety – Use Cases(use_case)