When Shallow Wins: Silent Failures and the Depth-Accuracy Paradox in Latent Reasoning
When Shallow Wins: Silent Failures and the Depth-Accuracy Paradox in Latent Reasoning explores Develop robust mathematical reasoning models for educational and decision support systems employing novel faithfulness metrics.. Commercial viability score: 5/10 in Mathematical Reasoning Systems.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisBrainBench: Exposing the Commonsense Reasoning Gap in Large Language ModelsViability: 4.0
- Builds On ThisThe Cost of Reasoning: Chain-of-Thought Induces Overconfidence in Vision-Language ModelsViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisPrompt Architecture Determines Reasoning Quality: A Variable Isolation Study on the Car Wash ProblemViability: 4.0
- Prior WorkRFEval: Benchmarking Reasoning Faithfulness under Counterfactual Reasoning Intervention in Large Reasoning ModelsViability: 5.0
- Prior WorkConsistency of Large Reasoning Models Under Multi-Turn Attacks