When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies
When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies explores Develops a taxonomy to evaluate the safety of untrusted AI monitoring systems against potential collusion strategies.. Commercial viability score: 2/10 in AI Safety.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Prior WorkTrust as Monitoring: Evolutionary Dynamics of User Trust and AI Developer BehaviourViability: 2.0
- Higher ViabilityLearning Contextual Runtime Monitors for Safe AI-Based AutonomyViability: 6.0
- Higher ViabilityBypassing AI Control Protocols via Agent-as-a-Proxy AttacksViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityDetecting Multi-Agent Collusion Through Multi-Agent InterpretabilityViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityThe Persistent Vulnerability of Aligned AI SystemsViability: 3.0
Related Resources
- What are the latest research breakthroughs in automotive AI safety?(question)
- What are the commercial implications of improved LLM interpretability for AI safety and reliability?(question)
- What are the implications of Certified Circuits for AI safety and robustness?(question)
- AI Safety – Use Cases(use_case)