Opportunity summary
Score8.0Public score shown from the verified overall while the stale axis breakdown refreshesThis canonical paper page includes Commercialization Proof and Related Resources.
ARXIV:2602.12670 · AGENTS · SUBMITTED 19 MAR · 21:31 UTC · FRESHNESS STALE
ARXIV:2602.12670AGENTSSUBMITTED 19 MAR · 21:31 UTCFRESHNESS STALEarXiv
SkillsBench evaluates the effectiveness of procedural Skills in boosting LLM agent task performance.
Opportunity summary
Pain SkillsBench evaluates the effectiveness of procedural Skills in boosting LLM agent task performance.
Evidence 0 refs | 0 sources | 33% coverage
Blocker Evidence failed
SkillsBench evaluates the effectiveness of procedural Skills in boosting LLM agent task performance. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help.
Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help.
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 8.0/10 on the public viability pass. Curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain (+4.5pp for Software Engineering to +51.9pp for Healthcare)…
Agents moved forward this cycle; last verified April 2026. Public score 8.0/10.
Continue into Read for claims, analysis, references, and neighboring papers.
mobile layout uses overflow-hidden min-w-0 break-wordsOpportunity summary
Score8.0Public score shown from the verified overall while the stale axis breakdown refreshesAnalysis summary
SkillsBench evaluates the effectiveness of procedural Skills in boosting LLM agent task performance.
Loading BUILD…
Paper Pack
10.48550/arXiv.2602.12670SkillsBench evaluates the effectiveness of procedural Skills in boosting LLM agent task performance.
Abstract
Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help. We present SkillsBench, a benchmark of 86 tasks across 11 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers. Each task is evaluated under three conditions: no Skills, curated Skills, and self-generated Skills. We test 7 agent-model configurations over 7,308 trajectories. Curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain (+4.5pp for Software Engineering to +51.9pp for Healthcare) and 16 of 84 tasks show negative deltas. Self-generated Skills provide no benefit on average, showing that models cannot reliably author the procedural knowledge they benefit from consuming. Focused Skills with 2--3 modules outperform comprehensive documentation, and smaller models with Skills can match larger models without them.
Source availability
PDF linkedThe paper record includes a public PDF URL.
Extraction status
Derived fallbackRead summaries are estimated from adjacent metadata, not verified extraction rows.
Proof status
failed0 refs; 0 sources; 33% coverage.
What was readable
Derived fallback: Estimated from adjacent evidence; not verified from source.
Viability
Time to MVP
Commercial
Export
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 8.0
PROBLEM
SkillsBench evaluates the effectiveness of procedural Skills in boosting LLM agent task performance. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help.
METHOD
Agent Skills are structured packages of procedural knowledge that augment LLM agents at inference time. Despite rapid adoption, there is no standard way to measure whether they actually help.
RESULT
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 8.0/10 on the public viability pass. Curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp), but effects vary widely by domain (+4.5pp for Software Engineering to +51.9pp for Healthcare) and 16 of 84 tasks show negative deltas.
WHY NOW
Agents moved forward this cycle; last verified April 2026. Public score 8.0/10.
We test 7 agent-model configurations over 7,308 trajectories
Specific numbers provided in abstract indicating comprehensive evaluation
partial
Curated Skills raise average pass rate by 16.2 percentage points(pp)
Explicitly stated in abstract with specific numeric result
partial
effects vary widely by domain (+4.5pp for Software Engineering to +51.9pp for Healthcare)
Specific domain-level performance differences with exact numbers provided in abstract
partial
Self-generated Skills provide no benefit on average
Directly stated in abstract with clear conclusion
partial
16 of 84 tasks show negative deltas
Specific count provided in abstract indicating limitations
partial
Focused Skills with 2--3 modules outperform comprehensive documentation
Directly stated in abstract but without specific performance numbers
partial
smaller models with Skills can match larger models without them
Directly stated in abstract but without specific model comparisons
partial
SkillsBench, a benchmark of 86 tasks across 11 domains paired with curated Skills and deterministic verifiers
Explicitly stated in abstract with specific counts
partial
Paper-native neighborhood for concepts, methods, materials, markets, and competitors. Missing lanes stay labeled instead of disappearing behind commercialization gates.
Concepts
Methods
Materials
Markets
Competitors
SkillsBench evaluates the effectiveness of procedural Skills in boosting LLM agent task performance.
Segment
Agents
Adoption evidence
No public code link in the paper record yet
Commercial read
8.0/10 public viability
Direct
Adjacent
Substitute
Unknown
No indexed public discussion is attached to 2602.12670 yet. That is a visibility signal, not a blank module: the monitor is watching the public channels below.
Hacker News
Not indexed yet
Not indexed yet
Bluesky
Not indexed yet
Preview the source document here, or use the hero PDF action for a new tab.
Showing 20 of 40 references
CITED BY
No citing papers are indexed in the public S2S graph yet. This is an explicit zero-signal state, not a hidden lookup.
Foundation
Extension
Commercially relevant
Conflicting
Owned Distribution
Get the weekly shortlist of commercializable papers, benchmark movers, and proof receipts that matter for product execution.
0/3 checks · 0%
Build Passport
Build passport pending - Proof Lab budget No verified cost estimate / $7.00 cap
status
missing
reason
passport_row_missing
proof status
unverified
cost/budget
No verified cost estimate
confidence low
next verification path
Build brief missing until Build Passport data exists.
Source missing: Build Passport payload.
Experiment plan missing until prototype path is available.
No prototype path attached.
Validation checklist missing until required assets, cost, and regulatory flags are verified.
No checklist artifact is attached to the Build Passport payload.
Derived signals show verified:false until source-backed receipts exist.
Evidence coverage
OpportunityKernel evidence_receipt
0 refs / 0 sources / 33% coverage
stale
Verify missing sources before using this as buyer proof. verified:false
Build readiness
BuildPassport EvidenceState
passport absent
stale
Run Proof Lab or inspect typed missing state. verified:false
Artifact maturity
GitHub and Hugging Face maturity payloads
No public artifact surface observed
stale
Open source artifacts or mark the gap as missing. verified:false
Technical feasibility
partial
Current read
Runnable path is not fully verified.
Evidence
No Build Passport payload attached.
Gaps
Next test
Run minimal reproduction from the Build Passport prototype path.
Market urgency
missing
Current read
Buyer urgency is not verified from source.
Evidence
0 references, 0 sources, 33% evidence coverage.
Gaps
Next test
Collect buyer interview, deployment evidence, or cited demand signal.
Buyer clarity
missing
Current read
No budget owner is verified for this paper.
Evidence
Build tab has no CRM, procurement, or operator source.
Gaps
Next test
Map target operator, economic buyer, and procurement trigger.
Defensibility
missing
Current read
Defensibility signals are missing.
Evidence
No defensibility receipt attached.
Gaps
Next test
Refresh defensibility bars with source receipts.
Integration burden
missing
Current read
No public implementation surface observed.
Evidence
No GitHub or Hugging Face payload attached.
Gaps
Next test
Write integration checklist from prototype path and target workflow.
Capital intensity
missing
Current read
No observed cost estimate is verified.
Evidence
Cost passport has no observed_usd value.
Gaps
Next test
Run cost passport or mark the cost field not applicable.
Regulatory load
missing
Current read
No regulatory classification is attached.
Evidence
Build Passport ledger does not include regulatory flags.
Gaps
Next test
Classify regulatory flags before commercialization planning.
No named scientific founder assigned.
Paper authors are not treated as operators without consent.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Prototype owner missing.
Build Passport does not name an implementer.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Operator workflow not sourced.
No buyer or workflow interview attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
No GTM owner verified.
No CRM or outreach source attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Regulatory need unclassified.
No clinical or regulatory source attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
ARTIFACTS
No public artifacts yet.
DEFENSIBILITY
Defensibility and confidence evidence pending.
WATCHTOWER
No verified watchtower monitor rows yet.
FORESIGHT
No prediction yet — minted on next Foresight batch.
OPPORTUNITYKERNEL CHANGES SINCE LAST VIEW
No verified OpportunityKernel changes since the last view.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE UPDATES
No verified competitive landscape changes yet.
RELATED PAPER UPDATES
No verified related paper changes yet.
SIGNAL CANVAS HISTORY AND DELTAS
No Signal Canvas history deltas yet.
TIMELINE
Save this paper to start tracking momentum - commits, demos, and score changes appear here.
No tracked events yet.
Score trend will appear after multiple data points.
BUZZ
Buzz trend pending.