RubricEval: A Rubric-Level Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Judges in Instruction Following
RubricEval: A Rubric-Level Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Judges in Instruction Following explores A new benchmark for evaluating the reliability of rubric-based instruction following in LLMs, revealing significant performance gaps even in advanced models.. Commercial viability score: 4/10 in LLM Evaluation.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Higher ViabilityRubricBench: Aligning Model-Generated Rubrics with Human StandardsViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityBeyond the Illusion of Consensus: From Surface Heuristics to Knowledge-Grounded Evaluation in LLM-as-a-JudgeViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityCDRRM: Contrast-Driven Rubric Generation for Reliable and Interpretable Reward ModelingViability: 8.0
- Higher ViabilityRationale Matters: Learning Transferable Rubrics via Proxy-Guided Critique for VLMReward ModelsViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityToward Robust LLM-Based Judges: Taxonomic Bias Evaluation and Debiasing Optimization