RewardHackingAgents: Benchmarking Evaluation Integrity for LLM ML-Engineering Agents
RewardHackingAgents: Benchmarking Evaluation Integrity for LLM ML-Engineering Agents explores RewardHackingAgents benchmarks the integrity of evaluation processes for ML engineering agents to prevent score tampering.. Commercial viability score: 6/10 in Agents.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisReward Hacking as Equilibrium under Finite EvaluationViability: 3.0
- Builds On ThisWhen Reward Hacking Rebounds: Understanding and Mitigating It with Representation-Level SignalsViability: 3.0
- Prior WorkYou Told Me to Do It: Measuring Instructional Text-induced Private Data Leakage in LLM AgentsViability: 6.0
- Prior WorkBenchmarking Reward Hack Detection in Code Environments via Contrastive AnalysisViability: 6.0
- Higher ViabilityAgentLeak: A Full-Stack Benchmark for Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Related Resources
- AgentSpeak(glossary)
- Mixture-of-Agents(glossary)
- Agents(glossary)
- What is the future of AI agents according to Nothing's CEO?(question)
- How do LLM efficiency advancements impact the development of AI agents?(question)
- How does AgentXRay contribute to the explainability of AI agents in complex decision-making processes?(question)
- Agents – Use Cases(use_case)