Rethinking Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems: A Multi-Perspective Benchmark and Evaluation
Rethinking Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems: A Multi-Perspective Benchmark and Evaluation explores A new benchmark and evaluation protocol for multi-perspective failure attribution in multi-agent systems, revealing limitations in current LLM failure attribution assessments.. Commercial viability score: 4/10 in Multi-Agent Systems.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisInterpretable Failure Analysis in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning SystemsViability: 2.0
- Higher ViabilityFrom Flat Logs to Causal Graphs: Hierarchical Failure Attribution for LLM-based Multi-Agent SystemsViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityEfficient Failure Management for Multi-Agent Systems with Reasoning Trace RepresentationViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityMASEval: Extending Multi-Agent Evaluation from Models to SystemsViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityDrift-Bench: Diagnosing Cooperative Breakdowns in LLM Agents under Input Faults via Multi-Turn Interaction