Position on LLM-Assisted Peer Review: Addressing Reviewer Gap through Mentoring and Feedback
Position on LLM-Assisted Peer Review: Addressing Reviewer Gap through Mentoring and Feedback explores Develop LLM-based tools to mentor and enhance peer-review skills of academic reviewers.. Commercial viability score: 2/10 in Peer Review Enhancement.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Prior WorkMore Code, Less Reuse: Investigating Code Quality and Reviewer Sentiment towards AI-generated Pull RequestsViability: 2.0
- Higher ViabilityEvaluating LLM-Based Grant Proposal Review via Structured PerturbationsViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityReimagining Peer Review Process Through Multi-Agent Mechanism DesignViability: 3.0
- Higher ViabilityRbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback GenerationViability: 8.0
- Higher ViabilityHuman-in-the-Loop LLM Grading for Handwritten Mathematics Assessments