Mind the GAP: Text Safety Does Not Transfer to Tool-Call Safety in LLM Agents
Mind the GAP: Text Safety Does Not Transfer to Tool-Call Safety in LLM Agents explores Introducing the GAP benchmark to measure and mitigate divergence in text and tool-call safety for LLM agents across multiple domains.. Commercial viability score: 6/10 in AI Safety Evaluation.
Updated 2 days ago
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisAgentDrift: Unsafe Recommendation Drift Under Tool Corruption Hidden by Ranking Metrics in LLM AgentsViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisAlignment Backfire: Language-Dependent Reversal of Safety Interventions Across 16 Languages in LLM Multi-Agent SystemsViability: 4.0
- Prior WorkIn-Context Environments Induce Evaluation-Awareness in Language ModelsViability: 6.0
- Higher ViabilityWho Tests the Testers? Systematic Enumeration and Coverage Audit of LLM Agent Tool Call SafetyViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityClawSafety: "Safe" LLMs, Unsafe Agents