Opportunity summary
Score6.0Public score shown from the verified overall while the stale axis breakdown refreshesThis canonical paper page includes Commercialization Proof and Related Resources.
ARXIV:2603.11324 · BLOCKCHAIN SECURITY · SUBMITTED 02 APR · 02:30 UTC · FRESHNESS STALE
ARXIV:2603.11324BLOCKCHAIN SECURITYSUBMITTED 02 APR · 02:30 UTCFRESHNESS STALEarXiv
A leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection in decentralized applications using on-chain and OSINT signals.
Opportunity summary
Pain A leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection in decentralized applications using on-chain and OSINT signals.
Evidence 0 refs | 0 sources | 17% coverage
Blocker Evidence unverified
A leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection in decentralized applications using on-chain and OSINT signals. One of the most prevalent attacks is the rug pull, where project operators abruptly withdraw liquidity after artificially inflating…
Smart contract-based ecosystems enable decentralized applications without trusted intermediaries, but their immutability and permissionless design also facilitate large-scale fraud. One of the most prevalent attacks is the rug pull, where project operators abruptly withdraw…
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 6.0/10 on the public viability pass. Smart contract-based ecosystems enable decentralized applications without trusted intermediaries, but their immutability and permissionless design also facilitate large-scale fraud.
Blockchain Security moved forward this cycle; last verified April 2026. Public score 6.0/10.
Continue into Read for claims, analysis, references, and neighboring papers.
mobile layout uses overflow-hidden min-w-0 break-wordsOpportunity summary
Score6.0Public score shown from the verified overall while the stale axis breakdown refreshesAnalysis summary
A leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection in decentralized applications using on-chain and OSINT signals.
Loading BUILD…
Paper Pack
10.48550/arXiv.2603.11324A leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection in decentralized applications using on-chain and OSINT signals.
Abstract
Smart contract-based ecosystems enable decentralized applications without trusted intermediaries, but their immutability and permissionless design also facilitate large-scale fraud. One of the most prevalent attacks is the rug pull, where project operators abruptly withdraw liquidity after artificially inflating token value. Existing detection methods primarily rely on reactive on-chain signals and often suffer from temporal data leakage, limiting their real-world reliability. This paper proposes a leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection that integrates on-chain behavioral metrics with temporally aligned Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) signals. We construct a hand-labeled dataset of 1,000 token projects, spanning DeFi and non-DeFi settings, with all features extracted strictly prior to any liquidity withdrawal to preserve causal validity. The dataset combines structural on-chain indicators with external attention signals derived from social media activity and search trends. Within this framework, TabPFN is employed as a core modeling component for learning from multimodal tabular data under strict temporal constraints. Experimental results show that the proposed framework achieves strong discriminative performance and improved probability calibration compared to classical baselines, while maintaining low false-negative rates. By framing rug-pull detection as a causal, multimodal forecasting problem, this work emphasizes the necessity of leakage-resilient evaluation and calibrated risk estimation for deployment in blockchain security systems.
Source availability
PDF linkedThe paper record includes a public PDF URL.
Extraction status
Derived fallbackRead summaries are estimated from adjacent metadata, not verified extraction rows.
Proof status
unverified0 refs; 0 sources; 17% coverage.
What was readable
Derived fallback: Estimated from adjacent evidence; not verified from source.
Viability
Time to MVP
Commercial
Export
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 6.0
PROBLEM
A leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection in decentralized applications using on-chain and OSINT signals. One of the most prevalent attacks is the rug pull, where project operators abruptly withdraw liquidity after artificially inflating token value.
METHOD
Smart contract-based ecosystems enable decentralized applications without trusted intermediaries, but their immutability and permissionless design also facilitate large-scale fraud. One of the most prevalent attacks is the rug pull, where project operators abruptly withdraw liqu...
RESULT
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 6.0/10 on the public viability pass. Smart contract-based ecosystems enable decentralized applications without trusted intermediaries, but their immutability and permissionless design also facilitate large-scale fraud.
WHY NOW
Blockchain Security moved forward this cycle; last verified April 2026. Public score 6.0/10.
Abstract-backed public claims while anchored extraction refreshes.
A leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection in decentralized applications using on-chain and OSINT signals. One of the most prevalent attacks is the rug pull, where project operators abruptly withdraw liquidity after artificially inflating token value.
Abstract-backed fallback claim; anchored extraction has not materialized a public claim row yet.
partial
Smart contract-based ecosystems enable decentralized applications without trusted intermediaries, but their immutability and permissionless design also facilitate large-scale fraud. One of the most prevalent attacks is the rug pull, where project operators abruptly withdraw liquidity after artificially inflating token value.
Abstract-backed fallback claim; anchored extraction has not materialized a public claim row yet.
partial
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 6.0/10 on the public viability pass. Smart contract-based ecosystems enable decentralized applications without trusted intermediaries, but their immutability and permissionless design also facilitate large-scale fraud.
Abstract-backed fallback claim; anchored extraction has not materialized a public claim row yet.
partial
Blockchain Security moved forward this cycle; last verified April 2026. Public score 6.0/10.
Abstract-backed fallback claim; anchored extraction has not materialized a public claim row yet.
partial
Paper-native neighborhood for concepts, methods, materials, markets, and competitors. Missing lanes stay labeled instead of disappearing behind commercialization gates.
Concepts
Methods
Materials
Markets
Competitors
A leakage-aware framework for early rug-pull detection in decentralized applications using on-chain and OSINT signals.
Segment
Blockchain Security
Adoption evidence
No public code link in the paper record yet
Commercial read
6.0/10 public viability
Direct
Adjacent
Substitute
Unknown
No indexed public discussion is attached to 2603.11324 yet. That is a visibility signal, not a blank module: the monitor is watching the public channels below.
Hacker News
Not indexed yet
Not indexed yet
Bluesky
Not indexed yet
Preview the source document here, or use the hero PDF action for a new tab.
Reference metadata is not materialized in the public index yet. The source PDF remains the authority; cache refresh is optional.
CITED BY
No citing papers are indexed in the public S2S graph yet. This is an explicit zero-signal state, not a hidden lookup.
Foundation
Extension
Commercially relevant
Conflicting
Owned Distribution
Get the weekly shortlist of commercializable papers, benchmark movers, and proof receipts that matter for product execution.
0/3 checks · 0%
Build Passport
Build passport pending - Proof Lab budget No verified cost estimate / $7.00 cap
status
missing
reason
passport_row_missing
proof status
unverified
cost/budget
No verified cost estimate
confidence low
next verification path
Build brief missing until Build Passport data exists.
Source missing: Build Passport payload.
Experiment plan missing until prototype path is available.
No prototype path attached.
Validation checklist missing until required assets, cost, and regulatory flags are verified.
No checklist artifact is attached to the Build Passport payload.
Derived signals show verified:false until source-backed receipts exist.
Evidence coverage
OpportunityKernel evidence_receipt
0 refs / 0 sources / 17% coverage
stale
Verify missing sources before using this as buyer proof. verified:false
Build readiness
BuildPassport EvidenceState
passport absent
stale
Run Proof Lab or inspect typed missing state. verified:false
Artifact maturity
GitHub and Hugging Face maturity payloads
No public artifact surface observed
stale
Open source artifacts or mark the gap as missing. verified:false
Technical feasibility
partial
Current read
Runnable path is not fully verified.
Evidence
No Build Passport payload attached.
Gaps
Next test
Run minimal reproduction from the Build Passport prototype path.
Market urgency
missing
Current read
Buyer urgency is not verified from source.
Evidence
0 references, 0 sources, 17% evidence coverage.
Gaps
Next test
Collect buyer interview, deployment evidence, or cited demand signal.
Buyer clarity
missing
Current read
No budget owner is verified for this paper.
Evidence
Build tab has no CRM, procurement, or operator source.
Gaps
Next test
Map target operator, economic buyer, and procurement trigger.
Defensibility
missing
Current read
Defensibility signals are missing.
Evidence
No defensibility receipt attached.
Gaps
Next test
Refresh defensibility bars with source receipts.
Integration burden
missing
Current read
No public implementation surface observed.
Evidence
No GitHub or Hugging Face payload attached.
Gaps
Next test
Write integration checklist from prototype path and target workflow.
Capital intensity
missing
Current read
No observed cost estimate is verified.
Evidence
Cost passport has no observed_usd value.
Gaps
Next test
Run cost passport or mark the cost field not applicable.
Regulatory load
missing
Current read
No regulatory classification is attached.
Evidence
Build Passport ledger does not include regulatory flags.
Gaps
Next test
Classify regulatory flags before commercialization planning.
No named scientific founder assigned.
Paper authors are not treated as operators without consent.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Prototype owner missing.
Build Passport does not name an implementer.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Operator workflow not sourced.
No buyer or workflow interview attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
No GTM owner verified.
No CRM or outreach source attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Regulatory need unclassified.
No clinical or regulatory source attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
ARTIFACTS
No public artifacts yet.
DEFENSIBILITY
Defensibility and confidence evidence pending.
WATCHTOWER
No verified watchtower monitor rows yet.
FORESIGHT
No prediction yet — minted on next Foresight batch.
OPPORTUNITYKERNEL CHANGES SINCE LAST VIEW
No verified OpportunityKernel changes since the last view.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE UPDATES
No verified competitive landscape changes yet.
RELATED PAPER UPDATES
No verified related paper changes yet.
SIGNAL CANVAS HISTORY AND DELTAS
No Signal Canvas history deltas yet.
TIMELINE
Save this paper to start tracking momentum - commits, demos, and score changes appear here.
No tracked events yet.
Score trend will appear after multiple data points.
BUZZ
Buzz trend pending.