LLMs Should Express Uncertainty Explicitly
LLMs Should Express Uncertainty Explicitly explores LLMs should express uncertainty explicitly through calibrated confidence scores or reasoning-time markers to improve decision-making and error handling.. Commercial viability score: 4/10 in LLM Uncertainty.
Use This Via API or MCP
Use the canonical paper page as a proof artifact
This route is the stable paper-level surface for citations, viability, references, and downstream handoffs. Use it as the proof layer behind Signal Canvas, workspace creation, and launch-pack generation.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisFrom Entropy to Calibrated Uncertainty: Training Language Models to Reason About UncertaintyViability: 3.0
- Prior WorkThe Anatomy of Uncertainty in LLMsViability: 4.0
- Prior WorkVerbalizing LLM's Higher-order Uncertainty via Imprecise ProbabilitiesViability: 4.0
- Higher ViabilityConfidence Before Answering: A Paradigm Shift for Efficient LLM Uncertainty EstimationViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityKnow What You Know: Metacognitive Entropy Calibration for Verifiable RL Reasoning