How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate in Document Q&A Scenarios? A 172-Billion-Token Study Across Temperatures, Context Lengths, and Hardware Platforms
How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate in Document Q&A Scenarios? A 172-Billion-Token Study Across Temperatures, Context Lengths, and Hardware Platforms explores RIKER is a ground-truth-first evaluation methodology that enables deterministic scoring of LLM hallucinations in document Q&A scenarios, providing insights for enterprise AI deployments.. Commercial viability score: 7/10 in LLM Evaluation.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisThe Fragility Of Moral Judgment In Large Language ModelsViability: 3.0
- Builds On ThisModeling the human lexicon under temperature variations: linguistic factors, diversity and typicality in LLM word associationsViability: 5.0
- Builds On ThisWhat Makes a Good Query? Measuring the Impact of Human-Confusing Linguistic Features on LLM PerformanceViability: 6.0
- Prior WorkMitigating LLM Hallucinations through Domain-Grounded Tiered RetrievalViability: 7.0
- Prior WorkEvaluating LLMs for Answering Student Questions in Introductory Programming Courses