From Storage to Steering: Memory Control Flow Attacks on LLM Agents
From Storage to Steering: Memory Control Flow Attacks on LLM Agents explores This paper explores a new security vulnerability in LLM agents related to memory control flow attacks.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in Security in LLMs.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
MVP Investment
$11K - $15K
6-10 weeksEngineering
$8,000GPU Compute
$800LLM API Credits
$500SaaS Stack
$800Domain & Legal
$5006mo ROI
0.5-1x
3yr ROI
6-15x
GPU-heavy products have higher costs but premium pricing. Expect break-even by 12mo, then 40%+ margins at scale.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisGoverning Evolving Memory in LLM Agents: Risks, Mechanisms, and the Stability and Safety Governed Memory (SSGM) FrameworkViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisZombie Agents: Persistent Control of Self-Evolving LLM Agents via Self-Reinforcing InjectionsViability: 1.0
- Higher ViabilityMemory for Autonomous LLM Agents:Mechanisms, Evaluation, and Emerging FrontiersViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityAdaptive Memory Admission Control for LLM AgentsViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityMemCtrl: Using MLLMs as Active Memory Controllers on Embodied Agents