Evaluating LLM-Simulated Conversations in Modeling Inconsistent and Uncollaborative Behaviors in Human Social Interaction
Evaluating LLM-Simulated Conversations in Modeling Inconsistent and Uncollaborative Behaviors in Human Social Interaction explores CoCoEval is an evaluation framework for analyzing inconsistent and uncollaborative behaviors in LLM-simulated conversations.. Commercial viability score: 2/10 in NLP Evaluation Frameworks.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisAn Empirical Study of Collective Behaviors and Social Dynamics in Large Language Model AgentsViability: 1.0
- Higher ViabilityMind the Sim2Real Gap in User Simulation for Agentic TasksViability: 4.0
- Higher ViabilityTowards Simulating Social Media Users with LLMs: Evaluating the Operational Validity of Conditioned Comment PredictionViability: 6.0
- Higher ViabilityThis human study did not involve human subjects: Validating LLM simulations as behavioral evidenceViability: 3.0
- Higher ViabilityConversation for Non-verifiable Learning: Self-Evolving LLMs through Meta-Evaluation