Edit, But Verify: An Empirical Audit of Instructed Code-Editing Benchmarks
Edit, But Verify: An Empirical Audit of Instructed Code-Editing Benchmarks explores An empirical audit of instructed code-editing benchmarks reveals significant gaps compared to real-world usage, proposing desiderata for more representative benchmarks.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in Code Generation & Editing.
Use This Via API or MCP
Use the canonical paper page as a proof artifact
This route is the stable paper-level surface for citations, viability, references, and downstream handoffs. Use it as the proof layer behind Signal Canvas, workspace creation, and launch-pack generation.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Higher ViabilityProdCodeBench: A Production-Derived Benchmark for Evaluating AI Coding AgentsViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityGEditBench v2: A Human-Aligned Benchmark for General Image EditingViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityCODESTRUCT: Code Agents over Structured Action SpacesViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityDLEBench: Evaluating Small-scale Object Editing Ability for Instruction-based Image Editing ModelViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityThe Model Agreed, But Didn't Learn: Diagnosing Surface Compliance in Large Language Models