Are Finer Citations Always Better? Rethinking Granularity for Attributed Generation
Are Finer Citations Always Better? Rethinking Granularity for Attributed Generation explores This research optimizes citation granularity in attributed generation models to improve attribution quality and answer correctness, finding that intermediate granularities perform best.. Commercial viability score: 4/10 in Attributed Generation.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisScaling In, Not Up? Testing Thick Citation Context Analysis with GPT-5 and Fragile PromptsViability: 2.0
- Prior WorkAligning Large Language Model Behavior with Human Citation PreferencesViability: 4.0
- Prior WorkOptimsyn: Influence-Guided Rubrics Optimization for Synthetic Data GenerationViability: 4.0
- Higher ViabilityDiagnosing and Repairing Citation Failures in Generative Engine OptimizationViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityPublic Profile Matters: A Scalable Integrated Approach to Recommend Citations in the Wild