Buildability / Receipt
What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review
This public receipt window renders only fields present in the canonical receipt object, deterministic fixture receipt, or canonical evidence receipt. Missing compute, demo, hash, signature, approval, telemetry, and adoption fields stay explicit.
Public buildability page receipt window
Not build-ready: What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review
/buildability/what-makes-a-good-ai-review-concern-level-diagnostics-for-ai-peer-review
Subject: What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review
Verdict
Ignore
Verdict is Ignore because current viability and proof state do not clear the buildability gate.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Compute envelope
Data
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 37, "author": "Ming Jin", "title": "What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review", "creation date": null
Compute
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 37, "author": "Ming Jin", "title": "What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review", "creation date": null, "modification date": null, "kids": []}
Inference
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 37, "author": "Ming Jin", "title": "What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review", "creation date": null, "modification date": null, "kids": []}
Hardware
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 37, "author": "Ming Jin", "title": "What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review", "creation date": null, "modification date": null, "kids": []}
Evidence ids
Receipt path
/buildability/what-makes-a-good-ai-review-concern-level-diagnostics-for-ai-peer-review
Paper ref
what-makes-a-good-ai-review-concern-level-diagnostics-for-ai-peer-review
arXiv id
2604.19998
Freshness
Generated at
2026-04-23T05:10:45.856Z
Evidence freshness
fresh
Last verification
2026-04-23T05:10:45.856Z
Sources
3
References
0
Coverage
50%
Hash state
Lineage hash
fe649d693171b772f4ba57028ac6b97bc2d72758dedf003a6c0b77f475c8c5eb
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
Signature state
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Blockers
- Missing: repo_url
- Missing: references
- Missing: proof_status
- Unknown: proof verification has not been recorded yet
Canonical opportunity-kernel evidence is available for this receipt window.
repo_url
references
Truth Boundary
External gate remains unresolved for live deployment claims.
Buildability surfaces only report computed viability and proof receipts. They do not claim live production usage, pilot outcomes, founder sign-off, public Brier calibration, judge divergence, or external adoption unless explicitly sourced.