Buildability / Receipt
Case-Specific Rubrics for Clinical AI Evaluation: Methodology, Validation, and LLM-Clinician Agreement Across 823 Encounters
This public receipt window renders only fields present in the canonical receipt object, deterministic fixture receipt, or canonical evidence receipt. Missing compute, demo, hash, signature, approval, telemetry, and adoption fields stay explicit.
Public buildability page receipt window
Watch and verify: Case-Specific Rubrics for Clinical AI Evaluation: Methodology, Validation, and LLM-Clinician Agreement Across 823 Encounters
/buildability/case-specific-rubrics-for-clinical-ai-evaluation-methodology-validation-and-llm-clinician-agreement-across-823-encounter
Subject: Case-Specific Rubrics for Clinical AI Evaluation: Methodology, Validation, and LLM-Clinician Agreement Across 823 Encounters
Verdict
Watch
Verdict is Watch because viability or proof quality is intermediate and should be re-evaluated before execution.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Compute envelope
Data
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 14, "author": "Aaryan Shah; Andrew Hines; Alexia Downs; Denis Bajet; Paulius Mui; Fabiano Araujo; Laura Offutt; Aida Rutledge
Compute
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 14, "author": "Aaryan Shah; Andrew Hines; Alexia Downs; Denis Bajet; Paulius Mui; Fabiano Araujo; Laura Offutt; Aida Rutledge; Elizabeth Jimenez", "title": "Case-Specific Rubrics for Clinical AI Evaluation: Methodology, Validation
Inference
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 14, "author": "Aaryan Shah; Andrew Hines; Alexia Downs; Denis Bajet; Paulius Mui; Fabiano Araujo; Laura Offutt; Aida Rutledge; Elizabeth Jimenez", "title": "Case-Specific Rubrics for Clinical AI Evaluation: Methodology, Validation
Hardware
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 14, "author": "Aaryan Shah; Andrew Hines; Alexia Downs; Denis Bajet; Paulius Mui; Fabiano Araujo; Laura Offutt; Aida Rutledge; Elizabeth Jimenez", "title": "Case-Specific Rubrics for Clinical AI Evaluation: Methodology, Validation
Evidence ids
Receipt path
/buildability/case-specific-rubrics-for-clinical-ai-evaluation-methodology-validation-and-llm-clinician-agreement-across-823-encounter
Paper ref
case-specific-rubrics-for-clinical-ai-evaluation-methodology-validation-and-llm-clinician-agreement-across-823-encounter
arXiv id
2604.24710
Freshness
Generated at
2026-04-28T15:18:48.596Z
Evidence freshness
fresh
Last verification
2026-04-28T15:18:48.596Z
Sources
3
References
0
Coverage
50%
Hash state
Lineage hash
7446d9f6b6818eb06cbce362104c3ce0c5dc0881726a06533cf41c65d3d29a05
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
Signature state
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Blockers
- Missing: repo_url
- Missing: references
- Missing: proof_status
- Unknown: proof verification has not been recorded yet
Canonical opportunity-kernel evidence is available for this receipt window.
repo_url
references
Truth Boundary
External gate remains unresolved for live deployment claims.
Buildability surfaces only report computed viability and proof receipts. They do not claim live production usage, pilot outcomes, founder sign-off, public Brier calibration, judge divergence, or external adoption unless explicitly sourced.