ScienceToStartup
TrendsTopicsSavedArticlesChangelogCareersAbout

113 Cherry St #92768

Seattle, WA 98104-2205

Backed by Research Labs
All systems operational

Product

  • Dashboard
  • Workspace
  • Build Loop
  • Research Map
  • Trends
  • Topics
  • Articles

Enterprise

  • TTO Dashboard
  • Scout Reports
  • RFP Marketplace
  • API

Resources

  • All Resources
  • Benchmark
  • Database
  • Dataset
  • Calculator
  • Glossary
  • State Reports
  • Industry Index
  • Directory
  • Templates
  • Alternatives
  • Changelog
  • FAQ
  • Docs

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • For Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal
  • Contact

Community

  • Open Source
  • Community
ScienceToStartup

Copyright © 2026 ScienceToStartup. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy|Legal
  1. Home
  2. Signal Canvas
  3. Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During H
← Back to Paper

Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Making

Fresh1d ago
Export BriefOpen in Build LoopConnect with Author
View PDF ↗
Viability
0.0/10

Compared to this week’s papers

Evidence Receipt

Freshness: 2026-04-02T02:30:40.136932+00:00

Claims: 0

References: 100

Proof: pending

Distribution: unknown

Source paper: Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Making

PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.11924v1

First buyer signal: unknown

Distribution channel: unknown

Starting…

Dimensions overall score 2.0

GitHub Code Pulse

No public code linked for this paper yet.

Claim map

Claim extraction is still pending for this paper. Check back after the next analysis run.

Competitive landscape

Competitor map is still being generated for this paper. Enable generation or check back soon.

Keep exploring

Prior Work
Mind the (DH) Gap! A Contrast in Risky Choices Between Reasoning and Conversational LLMs
Score 2.0stable
Prior Work
Argumentative Human-AI Decision-Making: Toward AI Agents That Reason With Us, Not For Us
Score 2.0stable
Prior Work
Legal interpretation and AI: from expert systems to argumentation and LLMs
Score 2.0stable
Higher Viability
Key Considerations for Domain Expert Involvement in LLM Design and Evaluation: An Ethnographic Study
Score 3.0up
Higher Viability
Language Models Exhibit Inconsistent Biases Towards Algorithmic Agents and Human Experts
Score 5.0up
Higher Viability
LLMs as Strategic Actors: Behavioral Alignment, Risk Calibration, and Argumentation Framing in Geopolitical Simulations
Score 3.0up
Higher Viability
How LLMs Distort Our Written Language
Score 7.0up
Higher Viability
From Retrieving Information to Reasoning with AI: Exploring Different Interaction Modalities to Support Human-AI Coordination in Clinical Decision-Making
Score 3.0up

Startup potential card

Startup potential card preview
Share on XLinkedIn

Related Resources

  • How does the lack of nuanced non-verbal cues from AI affect the emotional connection in human-AI interactions?(question)
  • What are the emerging trends in human-AI interaction research focused on user autonomy and trust?(question)
  • What are the most effective strategies for educating users about the potential pitfalls of human-AI interaction?(question)

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Recommended Stack

PyTorchML Framework
FastAPIBackend
TensorFlowML Framework
JAXML Framework
KerasML Framework

Startup Essentials

Render

Deploy Backend

Railway

Full-Stack Deploy

Supabase

Backend & Auth

Vercel

Deploy Frontend

Firebase

Google Backend

Hugging Face Hub

ML Model Hub

Banana.dev

GPU Inference

Antigravity

AI Agent IDE

Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.

MVP Investment

$9K - $13K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
GPU Compute
$800
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

0.5-1x

3yr ROI

6-15x

GPU-heavy products have higher costs but premium pricing. Expect break-even by 12mo, then 40%+ margins at scale.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Talent Scout

Find Builders

Human-AI experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.