Dimensions overall score 2.0

GitHub Code Pulse

No public code linked for this paper yet.

• User involvement in robotic wheelchair development is predominantly concentrated in late-stage evaluation rather than early requirements definition or iterative co-design.method 95%
• Only about 6% of the screened records (23 out of 399) met the inclusion criteria for verifiable end-user involvement in robotic wheelchair development.result 95%
• Many studies on robotic wheelchair development rely on small sample sizes, often around ten participants, with limited justification for sample size selection.method 95%
• Research teams involved in robotic wheelchair development are largely engineering-dominated (about 89%) and geographically concentrated in high-income countries.method 95%
• Despite evidence that sustained user engagement improves usability and adoption of assistive technology, its systematic implementation in robotic wheelchair research remains rare.limitation 90%
• Advancing the field of robotic wheelchair development requires embedding participatory methodologies throughout the design lifecycle.method 90%
• None of the reviewed studies explicitly mentioned adherence to ISO 9241-210: Human-centred design for interactive systems.method 85%

Competitive landscape

Competitor map is still being generated for this paper. Enable generation or check back soon.

Startup potential card