ScienceToStartup
TrendsTopicsSavedArticlesChangelogCareersAbout

113 Cherry St #92768

Seattle, WA 98104-2205

Backed by Research Labs
All systems operational

Product

  • Dashboard
  • Workspace
  • Build Loop
  • Research Map
  • Trends
  • Topics
  • Articles

Enterprise

  • TTO Dashboard
  • Scout Reports
  • RFP Marketplace
  • API

Resources

  • All Resources
  • Benchmark
  • Database
  • Dataset
  • Calculator
  • Glossary
  • State Reports
  • Industry Index
  • Directory
  • Templates
  • Alternatives
  • Changelog
  • FAQ
  • Docs

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • For Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal
  • Contact

Community

  • Open Source
  • Community
ScienceToStartup

Copyright © 2026 ScienceToStartup. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy|Legal
  1. Home
  2. Signal Canvas
  3. Defensible Design for OpenClaw: Securing Autonomous Tool-Inv
← Back to Paper

Defensible Design for OpenClaw: Securing Autonomous Tool-Invoking Agents

Fresh2d ago
Export BriefOpen in Build LoopConnect with Author
View PDF ↗
Viability
0.0/10

Compared to this week’s papers

Evidence fresh

Evidence Receipt

Freshness: 2026-04-02T02:30:40.136932+00:00

Claims: 0

References: 0

Proof: unverified

Freshness: fresh

Source paper: Defensible Design for OpenClaw: Securing Autonomous Tool-Invoking Agents

PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.13151v1

Source count: 0

Coverage: 17%

Last proof check: 2026-04-02T02:30:40.136Z

Paper Conversation

Citation-first answers with explicit evidence receipts, disagreement handling, commercialization framing, and next actions.

Paper Mode

Defensible Design for OpenClaw: Securing Autonomous Tool-Invoking Agents

Overall score: 2/10
Lineage: 9d1b58755f63…
Cmd/Ctrl+K
Search the latest paper corpus with startup-focused AI synthesis.

Canonical Paper Receipt

Last verification: 2026-04-02T02:30:40.136Z

Freshness: fresh

Proof: unverified

Repo: missing

References: 0

Sources: 0

Coverage: 17%

Missingness
  • - repo_url
  • - references
  • - proof_status
  • - distribution_readiness_scores
  • - paper_extraction_scorecards
Unknowns
  • - distribution readiness has not been computed yet
  • - proof verification has not been recorded yet

Mode Notes

  • Corpus mode searches the research corpus broadly.
  • Paper mode pins trust state to the canonical paper kernel.
  • Workspace mode blends saved sources, prior evidence queries, and linked papers.

Starting…

Dimensions overall score 2.0

GitHub Code Pulse

No public code linked for this paper yet.

Claim map

Claim extraction is still pending for this paper. Check back after the next analysis run.

Competitive landscape

Competitor map is still being generated for this paper. Enable generation or check back soon.

Keep exploring

Higher Viability
Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw
Score 8.0up
Higher Viability
Don't Let the Claw Grip Your Hand: A Security Analysis and Defense Framework for OpenClaw
Score 6.0up
Higher Viability
Taming OpenClaw: Security Analysis and Mitigation of Autonomous LLM Agent Threats
Score 4.0up
Higher Viability
Clawed and Dangerous: Can We Trust Open Agentic Systems?
Score 4.0up
Higher Viability
From Assistant to Double Agent: Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks on OpenClaw for Personalized Local AI Agent
Score 6.0up
Higher Viability
ClawKeeper: Comprehensive Safety Protection for OpenClaw Agents Through Skills, Plugins, and Watchers
Score 7.0up
Higher Viability
"What Did It Actually Do?": Understanding Risk Awareness and Traceability for Computer-Use Agents
Score 4.0up
Higher Viability
ClawSafety: "Safe" LLMs, Unsafe Agents
Score 7.0up

Startup potential card

Startup potential card preview
Share on XLinkedIn

Related Resources

  • AgentSpeak(glossary)
  • Mixture-of-Agents(glossary)
  • Agents(glossary)
  • What is the future of AI agents according to Nothing's CEO?(question)
  • How do LLM efficiency advancements impact the development of AI agents?(question)
  • How does AgentXRay contribute to the explainability of AI agents in complex decision-making processes?(question)
  • Agents – Use Cases(use_case)

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Recommended Stack

PyTorchML Framework
OpenAI APILLM API
Anthropic ClaudeLLM API
LangChainAgent Framework
CrewAIAgent Framework

Startup Essentials

Antigravity

AI Agent IDE

Render

Deploy Backend

Railway

Full-Stack Deploy

Supabase

Backend & Auth

Vercel

Deploy Frontend

Firebase

Google Backend

Hugging Face Hub

ML Model Hub

Banana.dev

GPU Inference

MVP Investment

$10K - $14K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
GPU Compute
$800
LLM API Credits
$500
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

1-2x

3yr ROI

10-25x

Automation tools have long sales cycles but high retention. Expect $5K MRR by 6mo, accelerating to $500K+ ARR at 3yr as enterprises adopt.

Talent Scout

Find Builders

Agents experts on LinkedIn & GitHub