Evidence Receipt. Related Resources.
Evidence Receipt. Related Resources.
Compared to this week’s papers
Verification pending
Use This Via API or MCP
Signal Canvas is the citation-first public layer for turning one paper into a structured commercialization narrative. Use it to hand off into REST, MCP, Build Loop, and launch-pack execution without losing source lineage.
Use This Via API or MCP
Route this paper proof surface into REST, MCP, or developer workflows while preserving the same evidence receipt and related-resource context.
Page Freshness
Canonical route: /signal-canvas/coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results
This page is showing the last landed evidence receipt and score bundle because the latest proof data is outside the freshness window.
Agent Handoff
Canonical ID coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results | Route /signal-canvas/coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results
REST example
curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/signal-canvas/coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-resultsMCP example
{
"tool": "search_signal_canvas",
"arguments": {
"mode": "paper",
"paper_ref": "coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results",
"query_text": "Summarize Coconstructions in spoken data: UD annotation guidelines and first results"
}
}source_context
{
"surface": "signal_canvas",
"mode": "paper",
"query": "Coconstructions in spoken data: UD annotation guidelines and first results",
"normalized_query": "2603.28261",
"route": "/signal-canvas/coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results",
"paper_ref": "coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results",
"topic_slug": null,
"benchmark_ref": null,
"dataset_ref": null
}Claims: 7
References: 13
Proof: Verification pending
Freshness state: computing
Source paper: Coconstructions in spoken data: UD annotation guidelines and first results
PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.28261v1
Source count: 3
Coverage: 50%
Last proof check: 2026-03-31T20:24:18.824Z
Signal Canvas receipt window
/buildability/coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results
Subject: Coconstructions in spoken data: UD annotation guidelines and first results
Verdict
Ignore
Verdict is Ignore because current viability and proof state do not clear the buildability gate.
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 2.0
No public code linked for this paper yet.
The paper proposes annotation guidelines for syntactic dependencies that span across speaker turns - including collaborative coconstructions proper, wh-question answers, and backchannels - in spoken language treebanks within the Universal Dependencies framework.
Explicitly stated in the abstract as the main contribution of the paper.
partial
Two representations are proposed: a speaker-based representation following the segmentation into speech turns, and a dependency-based representation with dependencies across speech turns.
Directly stated in the abstract as a core methodological proposal.
partial
Answers to wh-questions are analysed as syntactically dependent on the question, and thus as part of the same rectional unit, as already proposed in the guidelines of Rhapsodie.
Explicitly stated in the analysis section with reference to existing guidelines and examples.
partial
Backchannels differ from co-construction proper and from wh-questions coconstructions, in that they do no
Directly stated in the analysis, though the full explanation is cut off in the provided text.
partial
Due to the lack of clear guidelines for spoken data, important discrepancies exist among treebanks for spoken data (Dobrovoljc, 2022).
Directly stated as a motivation for the work, citing prior research.
partial
The treebank currently hosts 2 conversations from the original corpus, an interview (BOD2018, comprising 2 speakers) and a free conversation (BOA3017, comprising 4 speakers), for a total of 9,135 tokens and 1,007 sentences.
Explicit numeric data provided about the treebank's composition.
partial
Backchannels are annotated in 134 sentences: most of these are sentences composed by one single token that is frequently an INTJ such as ah, eh, mh or ok (67 cases), an ADV
Specific quantitative data provided about backchannel annotation, though the quote is slightly truncated.
partial
Related resources will appear here when this paper maps cleanly to topic, benchmark, or dataset surfaces.
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Structured compute envelope
Insufficient data
No data, compute, hardware, memory, latency, dependency, or serving requirement receipt is attached.
Receipt path
/buildability/coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results
Paper ref
coconstructions-in-spoken-data-ud-annotation-guidelines-and-first-results
arXiv id
2603.28261
Generated at
2026-03-31T20:24:18.824Z
Evidence freshness
stale
Last verification
2026-03-31T20:24:18.824Z
Sources
3
References
13
Coverage
50%
Lineage hash
71d05fff4d095434131b59f1ba38b4b0c8d472e011f12ad24d9edb552bfb3563
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
13 refs / 3 sources / Verification pending
repo_url
proof_status