Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study

Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study | Signal Canvas | ScienceToStartup

Page Freshness

Signal Canvas proof surface

Canonical route: /signal-canvas/blinded-radiologist-and-llm-based-evaluation-of-llm-generated-japanese-translations-of-chest-ct-reports-comparative-stud

stale

Proof freshness: stale
Proof status: unverified
Display score: 3/10
Last proof check: 2026-04-03
Score updated: 2026-04-03
Score fresh until: 2026-05-03
References: 0
Source count: 0
Coverage: 33%

This page is showing the last landed evidence receipt and score bundle because the latest proof data is outside the freshness window.

Agent Handoff

Canonical ID blinded-radiologist-and-llm-based-evaluation-of-llm-generated-japanese-translations-of-chest-ct-reports-comparative-stud | Route /signal-canvas/blinded-radiologist-and-llm-based-evaluation-of-llm-generated-japanese-translations-of-chest-ct-reports-comparative-stud

REST example

curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/signal-canvas/blinded-radiologist-and-llm-based-evaluation-of-llm-generated-japanese-translations-of-chest-ct-reports-comparative-stud

MCP example

{
  "tool": "search_signal_canvas",
  "arguments": {
    "mode": "paper",
    "paper_ref": "blinded-radiologist-and-llm-based-evaluation-of-llm-generated-japanese-translations-of-chest-ct-reports-comparative-stud",
    "query_text": "Summarize Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study"
  }
}

source_context

{
  "surface": "signal_canvas",
  "mode": "paper",
  "query": "Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study",
  "normalized_query": "2604.02207",
  "route": "/signal-canvas/blinded-radiologist-and-llm-based-evaluation-of-llm-generated-japanese-translations-of-chest-ct-reports-comparative-stud",
  "paper_ref": "blinded-radiologist-and-llm-based-evaluation-of-llm-generated-japanese-translations-of-chest-ct-reports-comparative-stud",
  "topic_slug": null,
  "benchmark_ref": null,
  "dataset_ref": null
}

Evidence Receipt

Route status: building

Claims: 8

References: Pending verification

Proof: Verification pending

Freshness state: computing

Source paper: Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study

PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.02207v1

Source count: Pending verification

Coverage: 33%

Last proof check: 2026-04-03T20:50:40.241Z

Signal Canvas receipt window

Not build-ready: Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study

/buildability/blinded-radiologist-and-llm-based-evaluation-of-llm-generated-japanese-translations-of-chest-ct-reports-comparative-stud

Ignoreblocked

Subject: Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study

Verdict

Preparing verified analysis

GitHub Code Pulse

No public code linked for this paper yet.

Claim map

Strong 8Mixed 0Weak 0

Evidencepartial
Agreement between radiologists and LLM judges was near zero (QWK=-0.04 to 0.15).
Implicationpartial
Directly stated in results with specific QWK range provided
Verificationpartial
partial
Evidencepartial
Agreement between the 2 radiologists was also poor (QWK=0.01 to 0.06).
Implicationpartial
Directly stated in results with specific QWK range provided
Verificationpartial
partial
Evidencepartial
All 3 LLM judges strongly favored the LLM translation across all criteria (70%-99%)
Implicationpartial
Explicitly stated with specific percentage range (70%-99%)
Verificationpartial
partial
Evidencepartial
rated it as more radiologist-like in >93% of cases.
Implicationpartial
Explicitly stated with specific percentage (>93%)
Verificationpartial
partial
Evidencepartial
For educational use of translated radiology reports, automated LLM-based evaluation alone is insufficient
Implicationpartial
Direct conclusion stated in the abstract
Verificationpartial
partial
Evidencepartial
expert radiologist review remains important.
Implicationpartial
Direct conclusion stated in the abstract
Verificationpartial
partial
Evidencepartial
a human-edited Japanese translation was compared with an LLM-generated translation by DeepSeek-V3.2.
Implicationpartial
Explicitly stated in methods section
Verificationpartial
partial
Evidencepartial
3 LLM judges (DeepSeek-V3.2, Mistral Large 3, and GPT-5) evaluated the same pairs.
Implicationpartial
Explicitly stated in methods section
Verificationpartial
partial

Author intelligence and commercialization panels stay hidden until the proof receipt is verified, cites at least 3 references, includes at least 2 sources, and clears 50% coverage. The paper narrative and citation surfaces remain public while verification is pending.

Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study

Use Signal Canvas as the narrative proof surface

Use this Signal Canvas via API or MCP

Signal Canvas proof surface