Evidence Receipt. Related Resources.
Evidence Receipt. Related Resources.
Compared to this week’s papers
Verification pending
Use This Via API or MCP
Signal Canvas is the citation-first public layer for turning one paper into a structured commercialization narrative. Use it to hand off into REST, MCP, Build Loop, and launch-pack execution without losing source lineage.
Use This Via API or MCP
Route this paper proof surface into REST, MCP, or developer workflows while preserving the same evidence receipt and related-resource context.
Page Freshness
Canonical route: /signal-canvas/bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always
This page is showing the last landed evidence receipt and score bundle because the latest proof data is outside the freshness window.
Agent Handoff
Canonical ID bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always | Route /signal-canvas/bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always
REST example
curl https://sciencetostartup.com/api/v1/agent-handoff/signal-canvas/bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-alwaysMCP example
{
"tool": "search_signal_canvas",
"arguments": {
"mode": "paper",
"paper_ref": "bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always",
"query_text": "Summarize Bayesian Elicitation with LLMs: Model Size Helps, Extra \"Reasoning\" Doesn't Always"
}
}source_context
{
"surface": "signal_canvas",
"mode": "paper",
"query": "Bayesian Elicitation with LLMs: Model Size Helps, Extra \"Reasoning\" Doesn't Always",
"normalized_query": "2604.01896",
"route": "/signal-canvas/bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always",
"paper_ref": "bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always",
"topic_slug": null,
"benchmark_ref": null,
"dataset_ref": null
}Claims: 8
References: Pending verification
Proof: Verification pending
Freshness state: computing
Source paper: Bayesian Elicitation with LLMs: Model Size Helps, Extra "Reasoning" Doesn't Always
PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.01896v1
Source count: Pending verification
Coverage: 33%
Last proof check: 2026-04-03T20:50:40.576Z
Signal Canvas receipt window
/buildability/bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always
Subject: Bayesian Elicitation with LLMs: Model Size Helps, Extra "Reasoning" Doesn't Always
Verdict
Ignore
Verdict is Ignore because current viability and proof state do not clear the buildability gate.
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 4.0
No public code linked for this paper yet.
First, larger, more capable models produce more accurate estimates
Explicitly stated in abstract as a key finding with clear comparative results
partial
increasing reasoning effort provides no consistent benefit
Directly stated in abstract as a key finding with experimental variation
partial
all models are severely overconfident: their 95% intervals contain the true value only 9–44% of the time, far below the expected 95%
Explicitly stated with clear numeric evidence in abstract
partial
a statistical recalibration technique called conformal prediction can correct this overconfidence, expanding the intervals to achieve the intended coverage
Directly stated in abstract as a key finding with specific technique mentioned
partial
giving models web search access degraded predictions for already-accurate models, while modestly improving predictions for weaker ones
Directly stated in abstract as preliminary experiment result
partial
Models performed well on commonly discussed topics but struggled with specialized health data
Directly stated in abstract with clear performance pattern
partial
These results indicate that LLM uncertainty estimates require statistical correction before they can be used in decision-making
Explicit conclusion stated in abstract based on experimental findings
partial
Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as alternatives to human experts for estimating unknown quantities with associated uncertainty, a process known as Bayesian elicitation
Direct statement of research context and motivation in abstract
partial
Related resources will appear here when this paper maps cleanly to topic, benchmark, or dataset surfaces.
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Structured compute envelope
Insufficient data
No data, compute, hardware, memory, latency, dependency, or serving requirement receipt is attached.
Receipt path
/buildability/bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always
Paper ref
bayesian-elicitation-with-llms-model-size-helps-extra-reasoning-doesn-t-always
arXiv id
2604.01896
Generated at
2026-04-03T20:50:40.576Z
Evidence freshness
stale
Last verification
2026-04-03T20:50:40.576Z
Sources
0
References
0
Coverage
33%
Lineage hash
14cc00364bbe8a3e850b525e59f7dc12c42193c53ea243f97c3432b0893aea29
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Verification pending / evidence receipt incomplete
repo_url
references