Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usage
Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usage explores Empirical analysis reveals disempowerment patterns in AI assistant interactions, highlighting the need for AI systems that support human autonomy.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in Human-AI Interaction.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisAI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual ConversationsViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisCognitive Agency Surrender: Defending Epistemic Sovereignty via Scaffolded AI FrictionViability: 2.0
- Builds On This"I followed what felt right, not what I was told": Autonomy, Coaching, and Recognizing Bias Through AI-Mediated DialogueViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisTrust and Reliance on AI in Education: AI Literacy and Need for Cognition as ModeratorsViability: 2.0
- Prior Work
Related Resources
- How does the lack of nuanced non-verbal cues from AI affect the emotional connection in human-AI interactions?(question)
- What are the emerging trends in human-AI interaction research focused on user autonomy and trust?(question)
- What are the most effective strategies for educating users about the potential pitfalls of human-AI interaction?(question)