Watson & Holmes: A Naturalistic Benchmark for Comparing Human and LLM Reasoning
Watson & Holmes: A Naturalistic Benchmark for Comparing Human and LLM Reasoning explores A benchmark for evaluating LLM reasoning in naturalistic contexts developed from a detective tabletop game.. Commercial viability score: 5/10 in Benchmark Development.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisReasoning Promotes Robustness in Theory of Mind TasksViability: 4.0
- Builds On ThisThe Reasoning Trap -- Logical Reasoning as a Mechanistic Pathway to Situational AwarenessViability: 3.0
- Prior WorkAutomated Benchmark Generation from Domain Guidelines Informed by Bloom's TaxonomyViability: 5.0
- Prior WorkExamining Reasoning LLMs-as-Judges in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-TrainingViability: 5.0
- Prior WorkHumans and LLMs Diverge on Probabilistic InferencesViability: 5.0