On the Definition and Detection of Cherry-Picking in Counterfactual Explanations
On the Definition and Detection of Cherry-Picking in Counterfactual Explanations explores Develop safeguards to prevent cherry-picking in counterfactual explanations using formal definitions and audit detection strategies.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in Ethical AI.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Prior WorkDo Metrics for Counterfactual Explanations Align with User Perception?Viability: 3.0
- Higher ViabilityBeyond Factual Correctness: Mitigating Preference-Inconsistent Explanations in Explainable RecommendationViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityProvably Robust Bayesian Counterfactual Explanations under Model ChangesViability: 6.0
- Higher ViabilityWhat-If Explanations Over Time: Counterfactuals for Time Series ClassificationViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityExplaining Group Recommendations via Counterfactuals
Related Resources
- How can startups ensure ethical AI use?(question)
- How can startups ensure ethical AI use?(question)
- How can startups ensure ethical AI use?(question)