Opportunity summary
Score4.0This canonical paper page includes Commercialization Proof and Related Resources.
ARXIV:2605.13137 · AI FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH TOOLS · SUBMITTED 14 MAY · 20:10 UTC · FRESHNESS FRESH
ARXIV:2605.13137AI FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH TOOLSSUBMITTED 14 MAY · 20:10 UTCFRESHNESS FRESHGuoxiong Gao · Zeming Sun · Jiedong Jiang · Yutong Wang · Jingda Xu · Peihao Wu · +2 at arXiv
LeanSearch v2 optimizes global premise retrieval for Lean 4 theorem proving by significantly enhancing retrieval performance with state-of-the-art results.
Opportunity summary
Pain LeanSearch v2 optimizes global premise retrieval for Lean 4 theorem proving by significantly enhancing retrieval performance with state-of-the-art results.
Evidence 0 refs | 0 sources | 0% coverage
Blocker Evidence unverified
LeanSearch v2 optimizes global premise retrieval for Lean 4 theorem proving by significantly enhancing retrieval performance with state-of-the-art results. Existing tools address adjacent problems: semantic search engines find individual declarations matching a query, while…
Proving theorems in Lean 4 often requires identifying a scattered set of library lemmas whose joint use enables a concise proof -- a task we call global premise retrieval. Existing tools address adjacent problems:…
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 4.0/10 on the public viability pass. Proving theorems in Lean 4 often requires identifying a scattered set of library lemmas whose joint use enables a concise proof -- a task…
AI for Scientific Research Tools moved forward this cycle; last verified May 2026. Public score 4.0/10. Implementation evidence is present through a linked repository.
Continue into Read for claims, analysis, references, and neighboring papers.
mobile layout uses overflow-hidden min-w-0 break-wordsOpportunity summary
Score4.0Analysis summary
LeanSearch v2 optimizes global premise retrieval for Lean 4 theorem proving by significantly enhancing retrieval performance with state-of-the-art results.
Loading BUILD…
Paper Pack
10.48550/arXiv.2605.13137LeanSearch v2 optimizes global premise retrieval for Lean 4 theorem proving by significantly enhancing retrieval performance with state-of-the-art results.
Abstract
Proving theorems in Lean 4 often requires identifying a scattered set of library lemmas whose joint use enables a concise proof -- a task we call global premise retrieval. Existing tools address adjacent problems: semantic search engines find individual declarations matching a query, while premise-selection systems predict useful lemmas one tactic step at a time. Neither recovers the full premise set an entire theorem requires. We present LeanSearch v2, a two-mode retrieval system for this task. Its standard mode applies a hierarchy-informalized Mathlib corpus with an embedding-reranker pipeline, achieving state-of-the-art single-query retrieval without domain-specific fine-tuning (nDCG@10 of 0.62 vs. 0.53 for the next-best system). Its reasoning mode builds on standard mode as its retrieval substrate, targeting global premise retrieval through iterative sketch-retrieve-reflect cycles. On a 69-query benchmark of research-level Mathlib theorems, reasoning mode recovers 46.1% of ground-truth premise groups within 10 retrieved candidates, outperforming strong reasoning retrieval systems (38.0%) and premise-selection baselines (9.3%) on the same benchmark. In a controlled downstream evaluation with a fixed prover loop, replacing alternative retrievers with LeanSearch v2 yields the highest proof success (20% vs. 16% for the next-best system and 4% without retrieval), confirming that retrieval quality propagates to proof generation. We have open-sourced all code, data, and benchmarks. Code and data: https://github.com/frenzymath/LeanSearch-v2 . The standard mode is publicly available with API access at https://leansearch.net/ .
Source availability
PDF linkedThe paper record includes a public PDF URL.
Extraction status
Parse run linkedA document parse run is attached to this paper.
Proof status
unverified0 refs; 0 sources; 0% coverage.
What was readable
Derived fallback: Estimated from adjacent evidence; not verified from source.
Viability
Time to MVP
Commercial
Export
Preparing verified analysis
Dimensions overall score 4.0
PROBLEM
LeanSearch v2 optimizes global premise retrieval for Lean 4 theorem proving by significantly enhancing retrieval performance with state-of-the-art results. Existing tools address adjacent problems: semantic search engines find individual declarations matching a query, while prem...
METHOD
Proving theorems in Lean 4 often requires identifying a scattered set of library lemmas whose joint use enables a concise proof -- a task we call global premise retrieval. Existing tools address adjacent problems: semantic search engines find individual declarations matching a q...
RESULT
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 4.0/10 on the public viability pass. Proving theorems in Lean 4 often requires identifying a scattered set of library lemmas whose joint use enables a concise proof -- a task we call global premise retrieval. A public repository is linked, s...
WHY NOW
AI for Scientific Research Tools moved forward this cycle; last verified May 2026. Public score 4.0/10. Implementation evidence is present through a linked repository.
Abstract-backed public claims while anchored extraction refreshes.
LeanSearch v2 optimizes global premise retrieval for Lean 4 theorem proving by significantly enhancing retrieval performance with state-of-the-art results. Existing tools address adjacent problems: semantic search engines find individual declarations matching a query, while premise-selection systems predict useful lemmas one tactic step at a time.
Abstract-backed fallback claim; anchored extraction has not materialized a public claim row yet.
partial
Proving theorems in Lean 4 often requires identifying a scattered set of library lemmas whose joint use enables a concise proof -- a task we call global premise retrieval. Existing tools address adjacent problems: semantic search engines find individual declarations matching a query, while premise-selection systems predict useful lemmas one tactic step at a time.
Abstract-backed fallback claim; anchored extraction has not materialized a public claim row yet.
partial
ScienceToStartup currently rates this 4.0/10 on the public viability pass. Proving theorems in Lean 4 often requires identifying a scattered set of library lemmas whose joint use enables a concise proof -- a task we call global premise retrieval. A public repository is linked, so build verification can inspect implementation evidence instead of treating the paper as PDF-only.
Abstract-backed fallback claim; anchored extraction has not materialized a public claim row yet.
partial
AI for Scientific Research Tools moved forward this cycle; last verified May 2026. Public score 4.0/10. Implementation evidence is present through a linked repository.
Abstract-backed fallback claim; anchored extraction has not materialized a public claim row yet.
partial
Paper-native neighborhood for concepts, methods, materials, markets, and competitors. Missing lanes stay labeled instead of disappearing behind commercialization gates.
Concepts
Methods
Materials
Markets
Competitors
LeanSearch v2 optimizes global premise retrieval for Lean 4 theorem proving by significantly enhancing retrieval performance with state-of-the-art results.
Segment
AI for Scientific Research Tools
Adoption evidence
Public code linked for build inspection
Commercial read
4.0/10 public viability
Direct
Adjacent
Substitute
Unknown
No indexed public discussion is attached to 2605.13137 yet. That is a visibility signal, not a blank module: the monitor is watching the public channels below.
Hacker News
Not indexed yet
Not indexed yet
Bluesky
Not indexed yet
Preview the source document here, or use the hero PDF action for a new tab.
Reference metadata is not materialized in the public index yet. The source PDF remains the authority; cache refresh is optional.
CITED BY
No citing papers are indexed in the public S2S graph yet. This is an explicit zero-signal state, not a hidden lookup.
Foundation
Extension
Commercially relevant
Conflicting
Owned Distribution
Get the weekly shortlist of commercializable papers, benchmark movers, and proof receipts that matter for product execution.
0/3 checks · 0%
Build Passport
Build passport pending - Proof Lab budget No verified cost estimate / $7.00 cap
status
missing
reason
passport_row_missing
proof status
unverified
cost/budget
No verified cost estimate
confidence low
next verification path
Build brief missing until Build Passport data exists.
Source missing: Build Passport payload.
Experiment plan missing until prototype path is available.
No prototype path attached.
Validation checklist missing until required assets, cost, and regulatory flags are verified.
No checklist artifact is attached to the Build Passport payload.
Derived signals show verified:false until source-backed receipts exist.
Evidence coverage
OpportunityKernel evidence_receipt
0 refs / 0 sources / 0% coverage
fresh
Verify missing sources before using this as buyer proof. verified:false
Build readiness
BuildPassport EvidenceState
passport absent
fresh
Run Proof Lab or inspect typed missing state. verified:false
Artifact maturity
GitHub and Hugging Face maturity payloads
No public artifact surface observed
fresh
Open source artifacts or mark the gap as missing. verified:false
Technical feasibility
partial
Current read
Runnable path is not fully verified.
Evidence
No Build Passport payload attached.
Gaps
Next test
Run minimal reproduction from the Build Passport prototype path.
Market urgency
missing
Current read
Buyer urgency is not verified from source.
Evidence
0 references, 0 sources, 0% evidence coverage.
Gaps
Next test
Collect buyer interview, deployment evidence, or cited demand signal.
Buyer clarity
missing
Current read
No budget owner is verified for this paper.
Evidence
Build tab has no CRM, procurement, or operator source.
Gaps
Next test
Map target operator, economic buyer, and procurement trigger.
Defensibility
missing
Current read
Defensibility signals are missing.
Evidence
No defensibility receipt attached.
Gaps
Next test
Refresh defensibility bars with source receipts.
Integration burden
missing
Current read
No public implementation surface observed.
Evidence
No GitHub or Hugging Face payload attached.
Gaps
Next test
Write integration checklist from prototype path and target workflow.
Capital intensity
missing
Current read
No observed cost estimate is verified.
Evidence
Cost passport has no observed_usd value.
Gaps
Next test
Run cost passport or mark the cost field not applicable.
Regulatory load
missing
Current read
No regulatory classification is attached.
Evidence
Build Passport ledger does not include regulatory flags.
Gaps
Next test
Classify regulatory flags before commercialization planning.
No named scientific founder assigned.
Paper authors are not treated as operators without consent.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Prototype owner missing.
Build Passport does not name an implementer.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Operator workflow not sourced.
No buyer or workflow interview attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
No GTM owner verified.
No CRM or outreach source attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
Regulatory need unclassified.
No clinical or regulatory source attached.
People
No named person assigned.
Gaps
Next verification path
ARTIFACTS
No public artifacts yet.
DEFENSIBILITY
Defensibility and confidence evidence pending.
WATCHTOWER
No verified watchtower monitor rows yet.
FORESIGHT
No prediction yet — minted on next Foresight batch.
OPPORTUNITYKERNEL CHANGES SINCE LAST VIEW
No verified OpportunityKernel changes since the last view.
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE UPDATES
No verified competitive landscape changes yet.
RELATED PAPER UPDATES
No verified related paper changes yet.
SIGNAL CANVAS HISTORY AND DELTAS
No Signal Canvas history deltas yet.
TIMELINE
Save this paper to start tracking momentum - commits, demos, and score changes appear here.
No tracked events yet.
Score trend will appear after multiple data points.
BUZZ
Buzz trend pending.