Guidelines for the Annotation and Visualization of Legal Argumentation Structures in Chinese Judicial Decisions
Guidelines for the Annotation and Visualization of Legal Argumentation Structures in Chinese Judicial Decisions explores An operational framework for annotating legal argumentation structures in Chinese judicial decisions.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in Legal AI.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisArgumentative Human-AI Decision-Making: Toward AI Agents That Reason With Us, Not For UsViability: 2.0
- Prior WorkLLM-based Argument Mining meets Argumentation and Description Logics: a Unified Framework for Reasoning about DebatesViability: 3.0
- Higher ViabilityLAMUS: A Large-Scale Corpus for Legal Argument Mining from U.S. Caselaw using LLMsViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityLLM-Assisted Causal Structure Disambiguation and Factor Extraction for Legal Judgment PredictionViability: 8.0
- Higher ViabilityLegal-DC: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Documents