Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing
Expert Evaluation and the Limits of Human Feedback in Mental Health AI Safety Testing explores A study highlighting the challenges and implications of expert disagreement in safety-critical AI for mental health applications.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in Mental Health AI.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Prior WorkDecomposing Physician Disagreement in HealthBenchViability: 3.0
- Prior WorkEvaluation format, not model capability, drives triage failure in the assessment of consumer health AIViability: 3.0
- Higher ViabilityAssessing the Quality of Mental Health Support in LLM Responses through Multi-Attribute Human EvaluationViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityVERA-MH: Reliability and Validity of an Open-Source AI Safety Evaluation in Mental HealthViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityBeyond the Illusion of Consensus: From Surface Heuristics to Knowledge-Grounded Evaluation in LLM-as-a-Judge