Defensive Refusal Bias: How Safety Alignment Fails Cyber Defenders
Defensive Refusal Bias: How Safety Alignment Fails Cyber Defenders explores Mitigating defensive refusal bias in LLMs to enhance cybersecurity applications without compromising safety.. Commercial viability score: 3/10 in Cybersecurity AI.
BUILDER'S SANDBOX
Build This Paper
Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.
OpenAI CodexAI Agent
Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.
Claude CodeAI Agent
Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding
AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.
CursorIDE
AI-first code editor built on VS Code.
VS CodeIDE
Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.
Recommended Stack
Startup Essentials
Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.
See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Related Papers
- Builds On ThisBeyond Refusal: Probing the Limits of Agentic Self-Correction for Semantic Sensitive InformationViability: 2.0
- Builds On ThisNetwork- and Device-Level Cyber Deception for Contested Environments Using RL and LLMsViability: 2.0
- Higher ViabilityDeactivating Refusal Triggers: Understanding and Mitigating Overrefusal in Safety AlignmentViability: 7.0
- Higher ViabilityDo Language Models Know When They'll Refuse? Probing Introspective Awareness of Safety BoundariesViability: 5.0
- Higher ViabilityEfficient Refusal Ablation in LLM through Optimal Transport