Buildability / Receipt
This public receipt window renders only fields present in the canonical receipt object, deterministic fixture receipt, or canonical evidence receipt. Missing compute, demo, hash, signature, approval, telemetry, and adoption fields stay explicit.
Public buildability page receipt window
/buildability/satisfying-rationality-postulates-of-structured-argumentation-through-deductive-support-technical-report
Subject: Satisfying Rationality Postulates of Structured Argumentation Through Deductive Support -- Technical Report
Verdict
Ignore
Verdict is Ignore because current viability and proof state do not clear the buildability gate.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Data
April 2026 4. There are a, c ∈ Aj s.t. CSub( a) = CSub(a′′)|ASj, CSub( c) = ADSub(c′′)|ASj and either ( a, c) ∈ →j, or ( c, a) ∈ →j. Since {c′0,...,c′p} ⊆ in(L) ∪ in(L+)
Truth Boundary
Buildability surfaces only report computed viability and proof receipts. They do not claim live production usage, pilot outcomes, founder sign-off, public Brier calibration, judge divergence, or external adoption unless explicitly sourced.
Compute
April 2026 4. There are a, c ∈ Aj s.t. CSub( a) = CSub(a′′)|ASj, CSub( c) = ADSub(c′′)|ASj and either ( a, c) ∈ →j, or ( c, a) ∈ →j. Since {c′0,...,c′p} ⊆ in(L) ∪ in(L+), we can use Lemma 2 to infer that CSub(c′′) ⊆ in(L)∪in(L+) and ADSub(c′′) ⊆ in(L)∪in(L+) holds
Inference
April 2026 4. There are a, c ∈ Aj s.t. CSub( a) = CSub(a′′)|ASj, CSub( c) = ADSub(c′′)|ASj and either ( a, c) ∈ →j, or ( c, a) ∈ →j. Since {c′0,...,c′p} ⊆ in(L) ∪ in(L+), we can use Lemma 2 to infer that CSub(c′′) ⊆ in(L)∪in(L+) and ADSub(c′′) ⊆ in(L)∪in(L+) holds
Hardware
April 2026 4. There are a, c ∈ Aj s.t. CSub( a) = CSub(a′′)|ASj, CSub( c) = ADSub(c′′)|ASj and either ( a, c) ∈ →j, or ( c, a) ∈ →j. Since {c′0,...,c′p} ⊆ in(L) ∪ in(L+), we can use Lemma 2 to infer that CSub(c′′) ⊆ in(L)∪in(L+) and ADSub(c′′) ⊆ in(L)∪in(L+) holds
Receipt path
/buildability/satisfying-rationality-postulates-of-structured-argumentation-through-deductive-support-technical-report
Paper ref
satisfying-rationality-postulates-of-structured-argumentation-through-deductive-support-technical-report
arXiv id
2604.21515
Generated at
2026-04-24T20:32:24.323Z
Evidence freshness
stale
Last verification
2026-04-24T20:32:24.323Z
Sources
3
References
0
Coverage
50%
Lineage hash
253d3f4ba268f57aed90010728199e18800c304441d6f45adc7ed4cd204e658f
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Some score or evidence fields are outside the preferred freshness window.
repo_url
references