Buildability / Receipt
This public receipt window renders only fields present in the canonical receipt object, deterministic fixture receipt, or canonical evidence receipt. Missing compute, demo, hash, signature, approval, telemetry, and adoption fields stay explicit.
Public buildability page receipt window
/buildability/safedit-does-multi-agent-decomposition-resolve-the-reliability-challenges-of-instructed-code-editing
Subject: SAFEdit: Does Multi-Agent Decomposition Resolve the Reliability Challenges of Instructed Code Editing?
Verdict
Watch
Verdict is Watch because viability or proof quality is intermediate and should be re-evaluated before execution.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Data
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 10, "author": "Noam Tarshish; Nofar Selouk; Daniel Hodisan; Bar Ezra Gafniel; Yuval Elovici; Asaf Shabtai; Eliya Nachmani"
Truth Boundary
Buildability surfaces only report computed viability and proof receipts. They do not claim live production usage, pilot outcomes, founder sign-off, public Brier calibration, judge divergence, or external adoption unless explicitly sourced.
Compute
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 10, "author": "Noam Tarshish; Nofar Selouk; Daniel Hodisan; Bar Ezra Gafniel; Yuval Elovici; Asaf Shabtai; Eliya Nachmani", "title": "SAFEdit: Does Multi-Agent Decomposition Resolve the Reliability Challenges of Instructed Code Editing?"
Inference
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 10, "author": "Noam Tarshish; Nofar Selouk; Daniel Hodisan; Bar Ezra Gafniel; Yuval Elovici; Asaf Shabtai; Eliya Nachmani", "title": "SAFEdit: Does Multi-Agent Decomposition Resolve the Reliability Challenges of Instructed Code Editing?"
Hardware
{"file name": "input.pdf", "number of pages": 10, "author": "Noam Tarshish; Nofar Selouk; Daniel Hodisan; Bar Ezra Gafniel; Yuval Elovici; Asaf Shabtai; Eliya Nachmani", "title": "SAFEdit: Does Multi-Agent Decomposition Resolve the Reliability Challenges of Instructed Code Editing?"
Receipt path
/buildability/safedit-does-multi-agent-decomposition-resolve-the-reliability-challenges-of-instructed-code-editing
Paper ref
safedit-does-multi-agent-decomposition-resolve-the-reliability-challenges-of-instructed-code-editing
arXiv id
2604.25737
Generated at
2026-04-29T02:43:26.229Z
Evidence freshness
stale
Last verification
2026-04-29T02:43:26.229Z
Sources
3
References
0
Coverage
50%
Lineage hash
adf56fbeba44056e1175c138cb4779715524a51590fc7ca3ee0699ac9bdef978
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Some score or evidence fields are outside the preferred freshness window.
repo_url
references