Buildability / Receipt
This public receipt window renders only fields present in the canonical receipt object, deterministic fixture receipt, or canonical evidence receipt. Missing compute, demo, hash, signature, approval, telemetry, and adoption fields stay explicit.
Public buildability page receipt window
/buildability/do-we-need-frontier-models-to-verify-mathematical-proofs
Subject: Do We Need Frontier Models to Verify Mathematical Proofs?
Verdict
Watch
Verdict is Watch because viability or proof quality is intermediate and should be re-evaluated before execution.
Time to first demo
Insufficient data
No first-demo timestamp, owner estimate, or elapsed demo receipt is attached to this surface.
Structured compute envelope
Insufficient data
No data, compute, hardware, memory, latency, dependency, or serving requirement receipt is attached.
Truth Boundary
Buildability surfaces only report computed viability and proof receipts. They do not claim live production usage, pilot outcomes, founder sign-off, public Brier calibration, judge divergence, or external adoption unless explicitly sourced.
Receipt path
/buildability/do-we-need-frontier-models-to-verify-mathematical-proofs
Paper ref
do-we-need-frontier-models-to-verify-mathematical-proofs
arXiv id
2604.02450
Generated at
2026-04-06T20:16:10.654Z
Evidence freshness
unknown
Last verification
2026-04-06T20:16:10.654Z
Sources
0
References
0
Coverage
0%
Lineage hash
3e8e2e6646078cce4cb07d4adced4cde4d8f6b7e439d68bbb6cc54f5007bc689
Canonical opportunity-kernel lineage hash.
External signature
unsigned_external
No founder, registry, pilot, or production-adoption signature is attached to this receipt.
Verification
not_verified
Verification is blocked until an external signature is provided.
Some score or evidence fields are outside the preferred freshness window.
paper_evidence_receipts.references_count
paper_evidence_receipts.coverage